April 1, 2010

THE BUDDHA ON PBS DOCUMENTARY SHOW [ APRIL 7, 2010]

[What in further we believe is that when the Buddha was born in 623 B.C. neither Nepal nor India existed in the subcontinent. We do not know the actual political geography of  the subcontinent in and around the 6th century B.C. but if we are talking of the Buddha in the present context,  the Lord was born in Lumbini of today’s Nepal. So he can't be said in any way he was born in a small Indian kingdom.


March 31, 2010]

 AN OPEN LETTER TO DAVID GRUBIN PRODUCTIONS

The  David Grubin Productions,
125 West 94th StreetNew YorkNY 10025


Many thanks for making a documentary film on the Buddha, the Prince of Peace and Compassion. We would particularly like to thank the  award-wining filmmaker David Grubin for making a film on such a matter of profound significance. We also understand the film is being aired by PBS -  Public Broadcasting Service -  on  April 7th, 2010 with its nearly 360 member stations all over the United States of America and 110 million people through their local stations and nearly 19 million people online are expected to watch it.

We  also watched the posted preview trailer of the film which starts with a fairly nice background how the Buddha was conceived by his mother. There we heard a narrator as saying, 'the Buddha was born in a small Indian kingdom'. 

Our attention has been drawn to this narration. Because the Lumbini archaeological finds, particularly the Lumbini Ashokan pillar inscription does not support that the Buddha was born in an Indian kingdom. No literature on the Buddha says he was born in India. We believe this is not right information media like PBS would disseminate to the public. The information requires to be corrected before it reaches to the general public – we believe.

What in further we believe is that when the Buddha was born in 623 B.C. neither Nepal nor India existed in the subcontinent. We do not know the actual political geography of  the subcontinent in and around the 6th century B.C. but if we are talking of the Buddha in the present context,  the Lord was born in Lumbini of today’s Nepal. So he can't be said in any way he was born in a small Indian kingdom.

Thus we are very much concerned about the  Buddha being  called an Indian. It would have been much better had the narrator said the Buddha was born in present Nepal's Lumbini. You may check one of our recent postings on the Buddha birth place.

Currently, a kind of arm twisting is going on, in between the people of Nepal and India, on the Buddha birth place – Lumbini - and Kapilvastu also. The Indian side is reported as ‘forging’ another Lumbini at Aligadawa in Uttar Pradesh, a province of India.

Such kinds of provocative activities from the part of India have already annoyed Nepalese people  and the PBS down here in the United Sates of America showing a film on the Buddha with incorrect information may add  more fuel than water in the fire.

We would therefore request you to correct the information before the documentary is aired as scheduled on April the 7th  this year.

Sincerely Yours,

The Himalayan Voice Team
CambridgeMassachusetts
United States of America
Copy:
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 2050
__________________________________
Comments

19) Kusinagara was a cosmopolitan center so were Kapilvastu, Ramgram and Vaisali etc.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
 Sudarshan Raj Tiwari 
Date: Thu,
Apr 15, 2010 at 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in
India" ?
To: ANIK RASI
Cc: Himalayan Voice
Dear Mr Anik Rasi

Yes, but I was only saying that the eight republics were about Sakya state not inside it. Just as Nepal as a state could not be inside India as a state while they could make a cultural entity. We all know they were not federated states of a country, they were different countries. You can of course put Malla at the center, if you prefer that as a manner of saying because Kusinagara was a cosmopolitan center of that time, but so were Kapilvastu, Ramgram and Vaisali etc.
I think Moriya, Shakya, Koliya, Malla and Lichchhavi stretched east west making the boundaries with Nepal. History has it that the Lichchhavi, while they were escaping from the marching Kusan (who marched from Indus to take over the Gangatic plains at the heels of the breakdown of the Mauryan empire) were strong enough to overpower the rulers in Nepal and made it their country. The Lichchhavi republic was lost but Nepal had got a new ruling house! As late as 5th century AD, one Lichchhavi inscription talks of the Malla of Gandak area!

I feel nice to be discussing bits of pasts of places and people and learning more about ourselves in the process.

Thanks

Sudarshan Raj Tiwari

18) At capital city of Malla; not in Sakya state

From: ANIK RASI
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India" ?

Dear Mr. Tiwari,

The eight republics were localized at Kusinagara - capital city of Malla; not in Sakya state.

17)  India can’t be applied to a space in Buddha's time and an extent of its spatial territory

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Sudarshan Raj Tiwari <srtiwari@ioe.edu.np> wrote:


Dear all,

I would not agree with the suggestion that word India could be applied to a space in Buddha's time and an extent of its spatial territory could be established to include Pakistan and Nepal. You may like to know that Buddhist literary sources tell that none of the eight republics which shared the ashes of Lord Buddha was called India and all of them were localized in a small area about Sakya state.

It was only by the time of Ashok's grandfather Chandragupta that the Moriya state was expanded to the Indus and at that time when Kautilya wrote his Arthashastra he stated that Nepal was a foreign country for the Mauryans. Historicizing that the Kauravs and the Pandavs and their supporting warring states constituted 'word India for that time' is a poor translation of the word Mahabharata as Greater India of Buddha's time!

Sudarshan Raj Tiwari  

16) So, what is the big deal whether the Budha was born here or there?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Ram B  Chherti  wrote:

For an enlightened mystic the world takes a different perspective and meaning. These enlightened beings are not bound by the narrow boundary of  man made geography. Only those who experience it directly  know what is like. Many parables for the inquisitive souls.

Uninterested intellectual curiosity is the life blood of real civilization as one scholar put it after  putting it to the test. Reading thousands of books wouldn't get anyone anywhere. One has to experience the thrill of mountain climbing; similarly one has to experience the bliss of being Budha as every one is potentially one. So, what is the big deal whether the Budha was born here or there ?
Thank you.
R. B. Chhetri

15) In Buddha’s time Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal were  within India

Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:05 AM

Subject: RE: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India" ?

Moreover, in Buddha's days, Nepal and India couldn’t be separated from each other. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal were included within word India for that time.
  
14) So Buddha was born in India: Gandhi was born in South Africa ?

Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:34:23 -0400
Subject: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in
India" ?
From:
 himalayanvoice@gmail.com

Dear All,

Prof. Sudarshan K Tiwari  writes, below  "one noted Indian politician making a speech (in Lumbini of all places and in presence of Nepal’s Prime Minister at the foundation laying of the cover structure over the archeological site) that Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India" No Nepali speaker debated then.  He again writes "... that Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born in India but Mahatma Gandhi was born in a Transvaal train, (in South Africa). And you may read his paper here also. 

We hope the Indian Kapilvastu Forum people will have sometime to read a paper by Tara N. Mishra in reply to their recent post on Kapilvastu. 

Thank you  and have a nice weekend everybody,

The Himalayan Voice Team
Cambridge, Massachusetts
United States of America
http://thehimalayanvoice.blogspot.com/

Comments:

13) Sincere thanks for the services you have extended to the country

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dibakar Pant
Date: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Subject: RE: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India" ?
To: himalayanvoice@gmail.com

The Himalayan Voice Team,

It's indeed, a very appreciative effort of your team to disseminate every right information about Nepal and Nepalese to persons and parties concerned. Please accept my sincere thanks for the services you have extended to the country.
I wish you all the best.
Happy and prosperous New Year,2067 B.S.

Dibakar Pant,
Retired Secretary ,  Government of Nepal
Currently in United States of America

12) Yes,The Buddha got enlightened in India

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram B Chherti
Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:44 PM
Subject: RE: "Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India" ?



There are far more important issues facing the humanity as never before than engaging full time in academic discussion of this type. Yes, in a way, he was right because the Buddha got enlightened in India. Personally, I feel that Buddha's  teachings are far more important than where he was actually born.



Thank you,



R B Chhetri



11) I am proud of you, we continue working together in other national issues also




---------- Forwarded message ----------



From: Durga Pokhrel




Date: Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:08 PM



Subject: RE: PBS Aired Buddha Documentary Saying Buddha Born in Nepal's Lumbini !
To: himalayanvoice
 
The Himalayan Voice Team, very well done by raising this important issue and getting responses from the concerned institutions I am proud of you, we continue working together in other national issues also,

Durga Pokhrel

10) No point sitting in argument with such people

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Sudarshan Raj Tiwari wrote:

Dear Sirs,

Buddha was born in Lumbini, not according to sacred tales alone. No less an authority as Emperor Ashok has left a note about the truth, may be for posterity of the unkind type that he expected would arise in the following empires.

Also Lumbini is the only one of the four key sites associated with Buddha which has been archaeologically investigated and the marker stone, the venerated spot of birth, is exposed for all to see.

I had heard one noted Indian politician making a speech (in Lumbini of all places and in presence of Nepal's Prime Minister at the foundation laying of the cover structure over the archeological site) that Siddartha Gautam was born in Lumbini but Buddha was born in India. There is no point sitting in argument with such people.

They would understand the foolishness in the argument if a South African said that Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born in India but Mahatma Gandhi was born in a Transvaal train, (in South Africa). No Nepali speaker however formally reacted to the Indian remark then.

Sudarshan Raj Tiwari,
Professor of Architecture,
Tribhuvan University,
Institute of Engineering, Lalitpur Nepal.

9) Documentary with mixed information

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, The Himalayan Voice wrote:

Dear All,

The PBS in USA aired the Buddha Documentary last   night. It aired the documentary with mixed information. It says 'his mother, a queen of small Indian kingdom", ‘Indian sage' and "In Southern Nepal, at the foot of the Himalayas, is one of the world's holiest places, Lumbini where, according to the sacred tales, the Buddha was born."

How the viewers took the information that is another question but unnecessary now! Anyway, many thanks to David Grubin Productions, PBS, National Endowment for Humanity' and "The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation for producing such a documentary of profound significance.

Sincerely yours,

The Himalayan Voice Team
Cambridge, Massachusetts
United States of America

8)  Produced in Boston, shared with the world

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:42 PM, WGBH Boston wrote:

The Himalayan Voice Team:

Thank you for your interest in WGBH. We always appreciate hearing from our viewers, listeners, and Web site visitors.

Thank you for e-mail regarding "Buddha" "Your comments have been forwarded to our program director and the producers of the program for careful review and consideration.

It is an important part of the process of programming for public television and radio to benefit from the response of viewers and listeners.  And we appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with us.

We hope you continue to enjoy the programs on WGBH - produced in Boston, shared with the world. Visit wgbh.org for information about WGBH programs and services and to sign up for our free weekly e-newsletter, @gbh, which includes reminders of upcoming programs on WGBH 2, 44, 89.7, information on your favorite PBS sites, answers to your questions, and the latest WGBH news.

Sincerely,

WGBH Member Development and Services
WGBH enriches people's lives through programs and services that educate, inspire, and entertain, fostering citizenship and culture, the joy of learning, and the power of diverse perspectives.

7) PBS Airing Wrong Information on the Buddha ?

Dear David Grubin Productions,

The preview trailer still says the same thing implying that the Buddha was born in India. We may seem here ethno-centric  but your narrating "his mother, queen of a small Indian kingdom had a dream" ;" Buddha the Indian sage" etc. makes us feel disgraced. This is  wrong information.

You have written below something different but the preview  trailer  still says the same thing. This is the clash of information in your documentary . Viewers will get bewildered surely.

Could you please do something about it.

Thank you,

The Himalayan Voice Team
Cambridge, Massachusetts
United States of America http://thehimalayanvoice.blogspot.com

6) We did not produce the program
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Viewer Services
Date: Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: PBS AIRING WRONG INFORMATION ON THE BUDDHA APRIL 7, 2010 ?
To: The Himalayan Voice

Hello,

Thank you for contacting us at New Hampshire Public Television.  We value your opinion about the ‘Buddha’ which will be shown later in April on NHPTV.  Since we did not produce the program, you should send your comments directly to the filmmaker, David Grubin, at: http://www.pbs.org/thebuddha/contact/

Sincerely,

Viewer Services
New Hampshire Public Television
268 Mast Road
Durham, NH   03824
(603)868-7552  fax
37th NHPTV Spring Auction
Follow the Auction action on Facebook!
It's never too late to donate...or volunteer!
May 7 - 16

5) The movie producer certainly deserves appreciation for his work on the Buddha

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram Babu Dhakal
Date: Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM
Subject: RE: PBS AIRING WRONG INFORMATION ON THE BUDDHA APRIL 7, 2010 ?

Dear friends,

The movie producer certainly deserves appreciation for his work on the Buddha, who is well regarded as the Light of Asia and Apostle of World Peace.

The teachings of Buddha 0n: truth, peace, non-violence, and compassion have become more relevant today than ever before. Even millions of Buddhist devotees and Hindus and others consider Buddha as incarnation of God.
I believe the film producer doesn't want to hurt this segment of human society. As far as the birthplace of Lord Buddha is concerned, the fact speaks itself of the history, through the Ashok Pillar and the Chinese pilgrim Huen Sang and Fa - Hien's writings, the record of UNESCO designating Lumbini as a world cultural heritage and the United Nations' International Committee for Development of Lumbini etc. The question is,  “where is Lumbini located?’ Anyone who would like to visit this place would, no doubt, find it in present Nepal.

Nepalese people are of proud of the fact that Nepal has always remained an independent country. I have also found misinformation being provided to the tourists. I believe no one should hesitate to speak and communicate the truth about the birthplace of Lord Buddha if we are truly to do justice to His teachings of peace and nonviolence in the present world.

I hope this will be a little help the movie producer in finding the true fact.

Ram Babu Dhakal
New York

4) Looks like PBS is also airing the voice come from big some shark
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram Upadhayay
Date: Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:51 AM
Subject: RE: PBS AIRING WRONG INFORMATION ON THE BUDDHA APRIL 7, 2010 ?

Dear  friend,

Looks like PBS is also airing the voice come from some big  shark. It does not look good for a reputed media organization like PBS to air this type of program. It looks like there are some artists who accept, without checking, everything for a  telecast whatsoever. It seems it does not matter for them whether it is authentic or false.
We need to raise voice against of these kinds of activities.

Thank you.

Ram Prasad Upadhayay

3) Enough is enough. 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram B Chherti
Date: Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:47 AM
Subject: RE: PBS AIRING WRONG INFORMATION ON THE BUDDHA APRIL 7, 2010 ?
Many thanks for this. Enough is enough. We will take it up with the highest authority in India through our wise and intelligent Indian friends.

R B Chhetri

2) Not the Sacred Tale but Historical Evidence:

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dr Shanker Thapa
Date: Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: Not the Sacred Tale but Historical evidence
To: David Grubin Productions
Cc: The Himalayan Voice

The David Grubin Productions,
125 West 94th Street, New York, NY 10025

Dear Sir,

I am very much concerned with the notification I received from the Himalayan Voice Team, Cambridge, Massachusetts, about your documentary film on the Buddha, the Prince of Peace and Compassion. Thanks for your response on the issue to the Himalayan team. However, I have some points to make you clear on what you replied to them. You have mentioned – 'In Southern Nepal, at the foot of the Himalayas, is one of the world's holiest places, Lumbini where, according to the sacred tales, the Buddha was born.'

The phrase 'Sacred Tales' has seriously drawn my attention. It is not the sacred tale, there is the Ashokan Pillar with an inscription in front of the Maya Devi temple as the concrete historical evidence which attests the fact that the Historical Buddha was born in Lumbini. And Lumbini is now situated in Rupandehi district in Southern Nepal. If you insist on the phrase 'Sacred Tales', it will be an unjust practice in the interpretation of history.

My concern to write you is to draw your attention and do justice in history. Please pay attention on it before your air the documentary.

Thank you very much.

Prof. Shanker Thapa
Dean
Lumbini Buddhist University
Bhrikuti Mandap, Kathmandu

1)  Reply from David Grubin Productions:
--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Grubin Productions
Date: Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: ON THE BUDDHA AGAIN: AN OPEN LETTER TO DAVID GRUBIN PRODUCTIONS
To: The Himalayan Voice

Dear Himalayan Voice Team:

Thank you for letting us know your concerns.  I think you will be happy to know that the film explicitly states:

In Southern Nepal, at the foot of the Himalayas, is one of the world's holiest places, Lumbini where, according to the sacred tales, the Buddha was born.

As you will see, the film has beautiful images of Lumbini and the pilgrims who travel there.

We hope that you will enjoy the documentary.
Sincerely yours,

David Grubin Productions.
125 West 94th Street, New York, NY 10025