[Sallie G. from
New York said freedom of speech in India had died when “it became the first
nation to ban Salman Rushdie’s book “The Satanic Verses” after threats of
violence by Indian Muslims.” Mr. Rushdie’s book was banned in India in 1988
after a flurry of criticism that the book decried Islam and its tenets.]
By Vishnu Varma
Kuni Takahashi for The New York Times |
In response to the story, we asked readers
whether they think freedom of speech is undergoing a gradual and cumulative
attack in India. We received an overwhelming response, with close to 400
comments on the website when the comments thread was finally closed. Many also
logged into Facebook to post their views.
Many of the readers agreed that censorship was
not the appropriate response to “bad speech” and that Penguin should never have
caved into pressure.
“All over the world, personal freedom and free
expression are under increasing attack by democratic and nondemocratic
regimes,” wrote Uziel from
Florianópolis, Brazil.
The reader also said the practice continues in
the United States – “bulwark of those basic rights after the events of 9/11.”
“It will be a sad day for India if Mr. Batra
succeeds in his crusade to outlaw and replace every book that he finds
offensive,” a reader with the user name scb919f7 said.
“Some people seem to have forgotten that books can and should do more than
simply confirm their own opinions and worldviews.”
Sirajul Islam, a reader from Dhaka,
Bangladesh, remarked that the political climate is worsening in India.
“Decisions like this (both the writing and
publishing a book on Hindu extremism at a sensitive time and then withdrawal/destruction
of the print copies) imply that the liberal space in Hinduism as well as in
Indian politics is being pruned, and what used to be the fringe is starting to
become the mainstream,” Mr. Islam said.
Sallie G. from
New York said freedom of speech in India had died when “it became the first
nation to ban Salman Rushdie’s book “The Satanic Verses” after threats of
violence by Indian Muslims.” Mr. Rushdie’s book was banned in India in 1988
after a flurry of criticism that the book decried Islam and its tenets.
Readers like Anuradha Mukherjee said on Facebook that the book
“contained a lot of factual errors and misinterpretations,” and that the issue
was blown out of proportion. However, she agreed that there was no need to
destroy the book.
Pradeep from
Ontario, Canada, said he believed that Penguin’s decision was more of a
corporate one in response to “peaceful protests.”
“Peaceful protest of the contents of a book or
speech is a civil right and an act of free speech itself,” said Pradeep. “Had
the government banned the book’s publication, that would have been a clear
violation of free speech. Had the protests been violent, it would have been a
blow to India’s liberal orientation. Fortunately, none of the above happened.”
However, Vikas Sharma, a reader from the United States,
said it was wrong to vilify Mr. Batra for what was “a fair and legal campaign
against a publishing powerhouse with millions in profit and an army of
lawyers.” He also said that since Penguin acceded to the lawsuit, then there
must be something wrong with the book.
WENDY DONIGER'S BOOK: 'YOU MUST TELL US WHAT TERRIFIED YOU', ARUNDHATI ROY WRITES TO PENGUIN INDIA
[The elections are still a few months away. The fascists are, thus far, only campaigning. Yes, it's looking bad, but they are not in power. Not yet. And you've already succumbed?]
[The elections are still a few months away. The fascists are, thus far, only campaigning. Yes, it's looking bad, but they are not in power. Not yet. And you've already succumbed?]
A letter to Penguin India (my
publishers)
Everybody
is shocked at what you have gone and done—at your out-of-court settlement with
an unknown Hindu fanatic outfit—in which you seem to have agreed to take Wendy
Donniger's The Hindus: An Alternative History off the bookshelves of 'Bharat'
and pulp it. There will soon no doubt be protestors gathered outside your
office, expressing their dismay.
Tell
us, please, what is it that scared you so? Have you forgotten who you are? You
are part of one of the oldest, grandest publishing houses in the world. You
existed long before publishing became just another business, and long before
books became products like any other perishable product in the market—mosquito
repellent or scented soap. You have published some of the greatest writers in
history. You have stood by them as publishers should, you have fought for free
speech against the most violent and terrifying odds. And now, even though there
was no fatwa, no ban, not even a court order, you have not only caved in, you
have humiliated yourself abjectly before a fly-by-night outfit by signing
settlement. Why? You have all the resources anybody could possibly need to
fight a legal battle. Had you stood your ground, you would have had the weight
of enlightened public opinion behind you, and the support of most—if not all—of
your writers. You must tell us what happened. What was it that terrified you?
You owe us, your writers an explanation at the very least.
The
elections are still a few months away. The fascists are, thus far, only
campaigning. Yes, it's looking bad, but they are not in power. Not yet. And
you've already succumbed?
What
are we to make of this? Must we now write only pro-Hindutva books? Or risk
being pulled off the bookshelves in 'Bharat' (as your 'settlement' puts it) and
pulped? Will there be some editorial guide-lines perhaps, for writers who
publish with Penguin? Is there a policy statement?
Frankly
I don't believe this has happened. Tell us it's just propaganda from a rival
publishing house. Or an April Fool's day prank that got leaked early. Please
say something. Tell us it's not true.
So
far I have had been more than happy to be published by Penguin. But now?
What
you have done affects us all.
Arundhati
Roy
(Author
of The God of Small Things, Listening to Grasshoppers, Broken Republic and
other books all of which are published by Penguin India)
@ The Times of India
@ The Times of India