October 25, 2020

TALIBAN SHOWS IT CAN LAUNCH ATTACKS ANYWHERE ACROSS AFGHANISTAN, EVEN AS PEACE TALKS CONTINUE

[The message of the surge is clear and coldblooded. Even as Taliban delegates continue to nominally participate in peace talks with Afghan leaders in Qatar, the insurgents have shown no intention of reducing violence. Instead, they appear out to prove they can wreak havoc everywhere.]


 

By Pamela Constable

 

KABUL — The gruesome image showed two dozen corpses in military uniforms, dragged into a tangled line on a hard empty plain. Their clothes were smeared with dirt, their faces wrapped in bloody rags.

 

The photo, circulating widely on social media here, was reportedly taken in far western Nimruz province, where military officials said Taliban attackers killed more than 20 soldiers Thursday evening.

 

But it could have been almost anywhere in Afghanistan.

 

In the past several weeks, Taliban fighters have staged ground attacks and bombings in 24 of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces, leaving scores dead. In northeastern Takhar they ambushed and killed at least 40 soldiers and police. In northwestern Ghowr, a car bomb killed 19 civilians. In southern Helmand, Taliban fighters are still clashing with Afghan forces after a two-week assault on the provincial capital region.

 

The message of the surge is clear and coldblooded. Even as Taliban delegates continue to nominally participate in peace talks with Afghan leaders in Qatar, the insurgents have shown no intention of reducing violence. Instead, they appear out to prove they can wreak havoc everywhere.

 

[Afghans stunned, worried by Trump tweet to bring home U.S. troops early]

 

In the past week alone, Afghan security officials said Saturday that the Taliban had staged 356 attacks, two suicide bombings and 52 mine explosions across the country, killing 51 civilians and wounding 157. They said more than 400 insurgents were killed but did not give casualty figures for Afghan forces. A suicide bombing in Kabul Saturday, which killed at least 24 students, was claimed by the Islamic State group, a rival extremist organization.

 

As the violence spreads, Afghans have expressed outrage, and several prominent Middle Eastern religious scholars have condemned the attacks, especially against civilians, as un-Islamic. But Taliban leaders, partly in response to the criticism, reiterated that they have the right to kill anyone connected with the Afghan government or its foreign backers.

 

“All troops and workers serving the Kabul administration have waged war against Muslims for the past 20 years. They are a bunch of criminals and mercenaries,” Zabiullah Mujahid, the chief Taliban spokesman, said in an interview published Saturday on a Taliban website. “As long as they do not repent and accept an Islamic system, they shall continue to be killed,” and those who kill them will be “rewarded immensely by God.”

 

Mujahid said his group had two long-term missions: “to force out foreign fighters” and to “reestablish an Islamic government.” Now that the United States has agreed to withdraw all its troops, he said, the second goal of waging “jihad” against the current government in Kabul is “mandatory.”

 

The spokesman made no mention of the peace talks, but Taliban delegates there have refused to recognize the U.S.-backed Afghan government’s legitimacy to negotiate, calling it an infidel foreign puppet. The delegation from Kabul includes a broad cross-section of prominent Afghans, all of them Muslim.

 

“We see no sense of urgency by the Taliban about ending this war,” one delegate to the talks said Saturday, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the group members have agreed not to air their views. “They are not listening to anyone. They are just killing time and killing people.”

 

In interviews Saturday, officials in five provinces where recent attacks have occurred expressed deepening worry about the new insurgent reach and the possible failure of the talks in Qatar.

 

Mohammad Mahdavi, a provincial council member in Ghowr, said the Taliban now controls or influences 90 percent of the province. The bombing last week in the capital, which also wounded 150 people, was not claimed by the Taliban, but Mahdavi said it was clear Taliban fighters were behind it.

 

[With U.S. troops gone, Taliban expands influence in one Afghan province]

 

“People here are in shock,” he said. “They have lost hope in the government.” He said the Taliban now controls most of the region’s highways, taxing goods on trucks and extorting passengers. “They can impose an economic embargo any time they want,” he said. “Now people fear it will get worse.”

 

In Nimruz, a relatively quiet province that borders both Iran and Pakistan, Gul Ahmad Noorzad, a legislator, said local security forces had been weakened by high-level corruption while soldiers are “being martyred every day. The morale is very low and nobody cares about them.”

 

The recent Taliban attacks in Nimruz have been unprecedented. In the past week, 12 police officers and a police chief were killed by a roadside bomb, 23 soldiers died when the Taliban attacked an army base, and seven policemen guarding a dam were killed by insurgent fighters near the provincial capital.

 

“The Taliban increased their violence to get more concessions in the negotiations, but no cease-fire has resulted,” Noorzad said. “People’s hope is turning into hopelessness.”

 

Some of the recent violence has provoked confusion and controversy. In Takhar, where Taliban fighters ambushed and killed more than 40 security forces on Thursday, there were reports that Afghan airstrikes aimed at Taliban targets had instead bombed a mosque-based school, killing a dozen children.

 

The government announced it would investigate and the Afghan independent human rights commission confirmed that the children had been killed. But Vice President Amrullah Saleh ordered the arrest of a Takhar resident who reported the bombing error, calling it “venomous and fake news.” Human Rights Watch, an international group, charged that Saleh was “trying to silence” someone for disclosing a “potentially unlawful” airstrike against civilians.

 

There has also been controversy over U.S. airstrikes that were called in last week to help repel the massive Taliban assault near Helmand’s capital city, Lashkar Gah. The Taliban furiously denounced those strikes as a violation of the agreement they signed with U.S. officials in February, while Afghan officials said the insurgents had broken the pact by attacking a city.

 

“The fighting has not stopped, and people cannot sleep,” Majid Ahkundzada, a Helmand provincial councilman, said Saturday. “The Taliban are walking around some wooded areas of the city with their AK-47s. They control the highway to Kandahar. The government has not restored security at all.”

 

Afghan observers offered mixed assessments of the Taliban’s reason for launching the wide spate of attacks. Most agreed that the violence is aimed at gaining advantage at the Doha talks, but some said it seemed more likely to destroy them.

 

Several observers warned that the insurgents were taking dangerous risks in pushing things so far, and that instead of leading them to victory in battle or at the peace table, it could lead to chaos.

 

“The Taliban’s strategy is inspired by history, when Soviet forces withdrew from Afghanistan and the government collapsed,” said Davood Moradian, director of the Afghan Institute of Strategic Studies. But if the insurgents think the pullout of U.S. forces followed by more violent aggression will help them to win power, he said, “they are making a historical mistake.”

 

Although the Taliban appears stronger now, he said, the insurgents cannot take power because too many domestic and foreign interests oppose them. If there is no political settlement, he added, “the alternative would not be the return of the Taliban. Afghanistan could become another Syria, and they would become just one of the warring factions.”

 

Sharif Hassan and Aziz Tassal in Kabul and Haq Nawaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

 

 

Read more


 

 

 

@ The Washington Post