[The Islamic State group claimed
responsibility for the attacks in Tunisia
and Kuwait , according to statements on
Twitter. But it almost did not matter for terrorism’s global implications
whether the three attacks were coordinated. Each in a different way underlined
the difficulties of anticipating threats and protecting civilians from
small-scale terrorist actions, whether in a mosque, at work or at the beach.]
The Imam Sadiq Mosque in
worshipers during Friday Prayer. Credit Raed Qutena/European
Pressphoto Agency
|
On the surface, the attacks appeared to be linked only by
timing.
In France, a man
stormed an American-owned chemical plant, decapitated one person and apparently
tried to blow up the facility. In Tunisia, a gunman drew an assault rifle
from a beach umbrella and killed at least 38 people at a seaside resort. And in
Kuwait , a suicide bomber blew himself
up inside a mosque during communal prayers, killing at least 25 Shiite
worshipers.
The
Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the attacks in Tunisia
and Kuwait , according to statements on
Twitter. But it almost did not matter for terrorism’s global implications
whether the three attacks were coordinated. Each in a different way underlined
the difficulties of anticipating threats and protecting civilians from
small-scale terrorist actions, whether in a mosque, at work or at the beach.
The United States has killed leaders of Al Qaeda
in Afghanistan , Yemenand
elsewhere, but the group has maintained a string of branches and melded itself
into local insurgencies. The Islamic State, also known as ISISor ISIL , has worked on two levels,
seeking to build its self-declared
caliphate on captured
territory in Iraq and Syria while inciting attacks abroad.
Fueling that expansion are civil wars and the collapse of state
structures in Arab countries from Libya to Yemen that have opened up ungoverned
spaces where jihadists thrive, while social media has given extremists a global
megaphone to spread their message.
While officials in the three
countries investigated the attacks, many noted that leaders of the Islamic
State have repeatedly called for sympathizers to kill and sow mayhem at home.
Earlier this week, the spokesman for the Islamic State, Abu Mohammed al-Adnani, greeted the group’s
followers for Ramadan,
telling them that acts during the Muslim holy month earned greater rewards in
heaven.
“Muslims, embark and hasten toward jihad,” Mr. Adnani said in an
audio message. “O mujahedeen everywhere, rush and go to make Ramadan a month of disasters for the
infidels.”
The
attacks targeted each country in a particularly sensitive spot.
The bombing in Kuwait followed the pattern of
similar attacks on Shiite mosques in Saudi Arabia and was aimed at sowing
sectarian divisions in a country where Sunnis and Shiites serve together in top
government bodies and open friction between the sects is uncommon.
The motivation behind the attack in France was less clear, although the
beheading suggested that the perpetrator had at least been inspired by the
Islamic State, which frequently propagandizes similar
killings in the
territories it occupies.
And because the day’s events appeared to bear some of the
infamous hallmarks of the Islamic State and its supporters, some analysts
speculated that the attacks had been timed to mark the first anniversary of its
declaration of a caliphate. Even if that is not the case, the SITE intelligence Group, which
tracks extremist propaganda, said the attacks inspired “celebration from
Twitter accounts of Jihadi fighters and supporters of the Islamic State.”
Lina Khatib, director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in
Beirut, said “We have entered a new jihadist era,” adding that the Islamic
State had used its international brand to establish sleeper cells abroad, whose
actions were meant to advance its efforts to build a state.
“Everything in the end serves the purpose of
strengthening the project of the Islamic State,” she said.
Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, condemned the attacks,
which he called “heinous.” But there was no word yet on whether they were
coordinated, he said. “We just don’t know yet.”
In claiming the Kuwait attack, the Islamic State
called the suicide bomber “one of the knights of the Sunni people” and lauded
him for killing Shiites, who are considered apostates in the group’s hard
interpretation of Islam.
The assault resembled others launched by the
Islamic State recently on Shiite mosques in neighboring Saudi Arabia,
prompting many to believe that the militant group is seeking to set off a
sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites.
“Ever
since I heard about Qatif and the Shiite mosques there, I just had this feeling
that we were next,” said Bodour Behbehani, a Shiite graduate student in Kuwait
City, recalling a mosque bombing last month
near Qatif, a city in
Saudi Arabia.
The American war on terrorism has taken many forms over the
years. But the spread of such small-scale attacks highlighted what even
American officials have called a failure to win the ideological — or
information — war that feeds militancy and inspires recruits.
The challenge, analysts and government officials say, is to
reorient a strategy centered on combat to one that challenges extremist groups
on all fronts simultaneously: political, social, ideological and religious. A
primary aim, they say, should be to win the information war and undermine the
appeal of radical Islamist ideologies.
Such terrorist attacks have shattered the assumption that the
Islamic State can be confined to territories it controls in the Middle East,
said Bruce Hoffman, director of the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown
University. Although Western governments can work to monitor those who might be
plotting attacks, this will not solve their root cause.
“Chasing individuals is probably a fool’s errand given the
geographically disparate nature of the threat,” Dr. Hoffman said. “There comes
a point where you have to tackle the organization behind it.”
And monitoring has limits. The authorities in Tunisia said the gunman there was a
young Tunisian with no prior police record. The authorities in France said that the attacker
arrested there had connections to radical Islamists but that surveillance of
him stopped in 2008.The Kuwaiti authorities did not identify the attacker in their
country.
It is an extraordinary coincidence that “all three attacks
happened at the same day and time,” said Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism
research fellow at New America, a research organization in Washington . He said the attacks suggested
that the focus on taking territory from the Islamic State could make the United States miss other ways it poses
dangers.
“We can’t get attached to a single metric for understanding this
organization,” he said.
Eric
Schmitt contributed reporting from Tampa , Fla. ; Hwaida Saad from Beirut ; and Rick Gladstone from New York .