[A
logistics operative with the Haqqani terrorist group, which uses
sanctuaries in Pakistan to carry out attacks on allied troops in Afghanistan , said militants could still hear drones flying
surveillance missions, day and night. “There are still drones, but there is no
fear anymore,” he said in a telephone interview. The logistics operative said
fighters now felt safer to roam more freely.]
By Eric Schmitt
Wali Khan Shinwari/European Pressphoto Agency
|
The
insurgents are increasingly taking advantage of tensions raised by an American
airstrike in November that killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers in two border
outposts, plunging relations between the countries to new depths. The Central
Intelligence Agency, hoping to avoid making matters worse while Pakistan completes a wide-ranging review of its security
relationship with the United States , has not conducted a drone strike since mid-November.
Diplomats
and intelligence analysts say the pause in C.I.A. missile strikes — the longest
in Pakistan in more than three years — is offering for now greater
freedom of movement to an insurgency that had been splintered by in-fighting and
battered by American drone attacks in recent months. Several feuding factions
said last week that they were patching up their differences, at least
temporarily, to improve their image after a series of kidnappings and, by some
accounts, to focus on fighting Americans in Afghanistan .
Other
militant groups continue attacking Pakistani forces. Just last week, Taliban insurgents
killed 15 security soldiers who had been kidnapped in retaliation for the death
of a militant commander.
The spike
in violence in the tribal areas — up nearly 10 percent in 2011 from the
previous year, according to a new independent report — comes amid reports of
negotiations between Pakistan ’s government and some local Taliban factions, although the
military denies that such talks are taking place.
A
logistics operative with the Haqqani terrorist group, which uses
sanctuaries in Pakistan to carry out attacks on allied troops in Afghanistan , said militants could still hear drones flying
surveillance missions, day and night. “There are still drones, but there is no
fear anymore,” he said in a telephone interview. The logistics operative said
fighters now felt safer to roam more freely.
Over all,
drone strikes in Pakistan dropped to 64 last year, compared with 117 strikes in
2010, according to The Long War Journal, a Web site that monitors the attacks.
Analysts attribute the decrease to a dwindling number of senior Qaeda leaders
and a pause in strikes last year after the arrest in January of Raymond Davis,
a C.I.A. security contractor who killed two Pakistanis; the Navy Seal raid in
May that killed Osama bin Laden; and the American airstrike on Nov. 26.
“It makes
sense that a lull in U.S. operations, coupled with ineffective Pakistani efforts,
might lead the terrorists to become complacent and try to regroup,” one
American official said. “We know that Al Qaeda’s leaders were constantly taking
the U.S. counterterrorism operations into account, spending
considerable time planning their movements and protecting their communications
to try to stay alive.”
C.
Christine Fair, an assistant professor of political science at Georgetown
University who just returned from a month in Pakistan , put it more bluntly: “They’re taking advantage of the
respite. It allows them to operate more freely.”
Several
administration officials said Saturday that any lull in drone strikes did not
signal a weakening of the country’s counterterrorism efforts, suggesting that
strikes could resume soon. “Without commenting on specific counterterrorism
operations, Al Qaeda is severely weakened, having suffered major losses in
recent years,” said George Little, a Defense Department spokesman. “But even a
diminished group of terrorists can pose danger, and thus our resolve to defeat
them is as strong as ever.”
Analysts
say the hiatus coincides with and probably has accelerated a flurry of
insurgent activity and new strategies.
In the
past week, leaflets distributed in North Waziristan announced that the Afghan
Taliban and Al Qaeda had urged several Pakistani militant groups to set aside
their differences and some commanders have reportedly asked their fighters to
focus on striking American-led allied forces in Afghanistan.
The
Pakistani groups include the Pakistani Taliban, an umbrella group led by
Hakimullah Mehsud that has mounted attacks against the Pakistani state since
the group was formed in 2007. The new council also includes the Haqqani network
and factions led by Maulvi Nazir of South
Waziristan and Hafiz Gul Bahadur
of North Waziristan, which already target NATO soldiers and have tacit peace
agreements with the Pakistani military.
In
telephone interviews, some Pakistani militants said the purpose of the
agreement was to settle internal differences among rival factions and improve
the image of the Taliban, which has been tarnished because of the increasing
use of kidnapping and the rise in civilian killings.
Other
analysts say that the Afghan Taliban are also feeling the pinch of American-led
night raids and other operations across the border. They said the Taliban
needed the militants in Pakistan ’s tribal region to focus more on helping to launch a final
offensive in Afghanistan , in hopes of gaining leverage before any peace talks and
the ultimate withdrawal of most American forces from Afghanistan by 2014.
One of the
main drivers of the accord was Sirajuddin Haqqani, the leader of the Haqqani
network, prompting some Pakistani analysts to reason that the Pakistani Army
had also prodded the creation of the council, or shura, to maintain its
leverage in any peace negotiations. Last summer Adm. Mike Mullen, who was then
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the Haqqanis “a veritable arm” of
Pakistan ’s main military spy agency.
“No
agreement is ever permanent in frontier politics, and it’s all very
complicated,” said one American government official with decades of experience
in Pakistan and its tribal areas.
Stuck in a
stalemate in the lawless borderlands with this array of militants are 150,000
Pakistani troops. A recent report by an Islamabad-based research organization,
the Pak Institute for Peace Studies, said that militant-based violence had
declined by 24 percent in the last two years. But it also concluded that
terrorist attacks in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, or FATA, and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Province increased 8 percent in 2011 from the year before.
“The
security situation remained volatile as militants dislodged from their
strongholds constantly managed to relocate to other parts of the FATA,” the
report said.
In a sign
of the shifting insurgent tactics, the number of suicide bombings in the
country declined to 39 through November, compared with a high of 81 in all of
2009, according to the Pakistani military.
The number
of attacks from homemade bombs, however, increased to 1,036 through November,
compared with 877 for all of 2009. More than 3,500 Pakistani soldiers and
police officers have been killed since 2002.
One senior
Pakistani Army officer with experience in the tribal areas said that insurgents
had devised increasingly diabolical triggers and fuses for bombs.
Unlike
Americans, Pakistani soldiers still drive in pickups or carriers with little
protection. “The effects are devastating,” said the officer, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity. “Vehicles are basically vaporized.”
“The
Pakistani Army is overstretched, and that’s clearly had an impact on morale,”
said Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the United States . “But we have to maintain the pressure on the militants.”