[U.S. officials insist that Trump’s absence does not signal a lack of focus on the region. Writing in The Washington Post on Friday ahead of his trip, Pence said the U.S. commitment to the Indo-Pacific was “steadfast and enduring,” and he accused some nations of undermining a “foundation” of sovereignty and free commercial trade flows in the region — a thinly veiled reference to China, which has been pushing sovereignty claims for years and expanding its military presence in the South China Sea.]
By
Shibani Mahtani
SINGAPORE
— When world leaders gather
in this city-state and Papua New Guinea for regional summits this week, there
will be a conspicuous absence: President Trump.
It is summit season in Asia, with Association
of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) meetings due to start Tuesday in Singapore.
The 10-member bloc hosts world leaders at the yearly East Asia Summit, a chance
for regional leaders to strengthen ties with global powers. Most will then
travel to Papua New Guinea for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
meetings, hosted this year by the poorest member of a 21-country bloc of
Pacific economies.
Russian President Vladimir Putin will be
visiting Singapore for the first time, meeting leaders in a region that is
increasingly looking to Moscow for arms purchases and diplomatic protection.
Chinese President Xi Jinping will be in Port Moresby for the APEC summit over
the weekend, underscoring Beijing’s strategic play in the South Pacific, and
will be deploying Chinese Premier Li Keqiang to Singapore to expand a
free-trade agreement with the city-state and “upgrade its relationship” with
Southeast Asian countries.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan and President Moon Jae-in of South Korea will also
be at the regional summits.
Trump, however, is skipping them entirely,
leaving Vice President Pence and national security adviser John Bolton to lead
the U.S. delegation. Analysts view Trump’s absence as a lost opportunity and
miscalculation at a time when Washington and Beijing are locked in a battle for
influence over a region that is China’s backyard.
The U.S. president’s decision not to show up
is a “major problem with really bad optics,” said Brian Harding, deputy
director of the Southeast Asia program at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies in Washington.
“Every country in Southeast Asia is trying to
forge a close relationship with the U.S. — they don’t want to live in a region
that’s dominated by China. They want options, and they want balance,” he said.
“It doesn’t send a good signal [of U.S. commitment] that the president doesn’t
want to attend the one summit he’s supposed to in Southeast Asia.”
Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama, was the
first U.S. president to attend the ASEAN-hosted East Asia Summit, in 2011, and
made the trip every year of his presidency thereafter except during a
government shutdown in 2013. The appearances were part of a broader pivot to
Asia, a region where Obama believed the United States could forge deeper ties
and find new allies.
Last year, Trump was in Manila for meetings
related to the regional bloc, but he left early and missed the summit itself.
U.S. officials insist that Trump’s absence
does not signal a lack of focus on the region. Writing in The Washington Post
on Friday ahead of his trip, Pence said the U.S. commitment to the Indo-Pacific
was “steadfast and enduring,” and he accused some nations of undermining a
“foundation” of sovereignty and free commercial trade flows in the region — a
thinly veiled reference to China, which has been pushing sovereignty claims for
years and expanding its military presence in the South China Sea.
Beijing also sees Southeast Asia as front and
center of its Belt and Road Initiative, a trillion-dollar-plus global
investment plan that countries have begun to see as a debt trap that will leave
them under China’s thumb.
In a statement, the vice president’s press
secretary, Alyssa Farah, said Pence is “honored to represent President Donald
Trump” and the summits and will “highlight American leadership in the region.”
“He will also deliver the message that
authoritarianism, aggression, and the disregard for other nations’ sovereignty
by any nation in the Indo-Pacific will not be tolerated by the United States,”
she added.
On a trip to Europe in recent days, Trump
drew criticism for failing to show up for a scheduled tour of an American
military cemetery, citing the weather. Analysts widely perceived the trip as
evidence of how isolated the United States under Trump has become from
traditional European allies.
Southeast Asia, however, is a region where
leaders have not taken particular offense to Trump’s “America First” rhetoric,
especially as many countries have moved closer toward authoritarian rule under
strongman leaders. Countries here continue to clamor for greater U.S.
involvement and leadership and want an alternative to China’s billion-dollar
investment promises that Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, an ASEAN
elder statesman, recently criticized as a “new version of colonialism.”
“Trump’s stock in Southeast Asia is not as
low as some might imagine,” said the CSIS’s Harding.
The Trump administration recently announced a
plan to support U.S.-style infrastructure development in the region, led by the
private sector but backed by billions in development financing. Analysts say
the plan needs to be fleshed out further, especially when Beijing is readying
billion-dollar infrastructure projects such as a massive economic corridor in
Myanmar and railways in the Philippines, a traditional U.S. ally.
Southeast Asian countries — which together
hold almost 10 percent of the world’s population, wedged between more-powerful
neighbors such as India, China, South Korea and Japan — have always felt
vulnerable about their geography and are likely to welcome the competition for
influence if it means investments from both the United States and China.
But Dino Patti Djalal, a former Indonesian
ambassador to Washington, said regional leaders are warning against a “zero-sum
geopolitical rivalry” between the two powers and do not want to be forced to
make a choice between the two.
“There is strong appetite for economic
brinkmanship from Washington,” he said, noting that the Trump administration’s
“diplomatic and political capital” is “declining” in the region. “I think we
are seeing greater polarization ahead.”
Read more