November 27, 2018

THE RĀNAKAS, RĀNES’ OR 'RĀNĀS OF ‘MAGWĀRA VISHAYA’ – THE WESTERN MID-HILLS NEPAL

[The word ‘Rana’ used to be ‘an official title’ offered to some ‘Magars’ (‘indigenous people’ in today’s terms) in the medieval Nepal. It was a popular title in entire south Asia during the middle ages.  It also comes from another Sanskrit word –rana, literally battle or skirmish. So basically, Rānā later became an honorary earned title in the battle.]



By B K Rana
                 
Magwār Vishāyā’ – literally  ‘Magwār (Magar) district’ or Magrāt and 'Shohab Rane' also. 
Picture from  'The Two Earliest Copper-plate Inscriptions from Nepal 1977'. 
THE RĀNAKAS OR RĀNES of the early medieval period are nowadays treated as Rānā Magars[1], one of the major groups of the Magar people in the Himalayan region. Some authors these days, seemingly some aspiring historians, are found writing that the 'Rānā' ‘used to be one of the army titles’ in medieval Nepal, a suggestion understandably obtained also from certain history books on the Khasa people[2]. It doesn’t seem to me to be historically correct to write this way. Contrarily, one of the renowned historians of India, Prof. Dinesh Chandra Sircar has written - Rānakas or 'Rānās meant  - ‘feudatory ruler and later nobility’ also (Sircar 1966: 276). It is not my intention though to glorify some certain group of Magars of the medieval Nepal because there is no point in doing so at all. Concurring with Dinesh Chandra Sircar and on the basis of some historical records, I shall attempt in this short note, to explore what the title-words:  ‘Rānakas’ or 'Rānes’ and Rānās’ practically meant in the medieval Nepal[3].

Dhanabajrā Bajrāchāryā, a prominent epigraphist of Nepal, has exclusively written that both the Rānakas and Rānes were  the 'Rānā Magars'  of today’s Himalayan region (Bajrāchāryā 2064:16, 32, 43).  And many Nepalese as well as western scholars also seem to have agreed  on it. And there were at least two ‘Rānakas’ and one ‘Rāne’ in the early medieval history of Nepal:

a) Suvarnakar Rānaka[4] of Gulmi :


"नेपाल सम्बत् ११९ अर्थात् बिक्रम सम्बत् १०५५ मार्ग शुक्ल पूर्णिमाका दिन श्रीगण्डी 
गुल्ममा बस्ने सुवर्णकार श्रीराणकले प्रतिष्ठा गरेको हो महाराजाधिराज परमेश्वर 
श्री नरेन्द्रदेवभट्टारक श्री उदयदेव भट्टारकको द्वैराज्यमा यो लेखिएको हो
He was from present day Gulmi district of west Nepal. He seems to have translated 'Asthashahashrikā Pragyāpārmitā' in Nepal Sambat 119 i. e. Bikram Sambat 1055 or 998 A.D. Gandigulma comes in Kalhana's Rajtarangini also.

b) Gaṇgā Rānaka[5] of Lamjung:

He also translated 'Asthashahashrikā Pragyāpārmitā' in Bikram Sambat 1126 i. e 1069 A.D. and which was preserved in Ngor Lamasery, near Lhasa in Tibet. The lamasery was destroyed following the Tibetan takeover by China in 1959.

c) Sohaba Rāne[6] of Magwar Vishaya:

He is written ‘Rāne’ not ‘Rānaka - (Bikram Sambat – 1157, i. e 1100 A. D.) - was an administrator of Magwar Vishaya (Magar district). Vishaya  meant district in the Lichhivi period (450 – 750 AD) of Nepalese history. This Magwara Vishaya, which,  as Dhanabajrā Bajrāchārya believes later became Magarāt,  was the neighbouring Vishaya  or district of Paṇnaga Vishaya. (Bajrāchāryā  2064:18,41)

As stated above, I shall write here only on the Rana Magars of the Himalayan region. And, we have no archaeological evidence to attest whether those two above mentioned: Suvarnakar Ranaka of Gulmi and Ganga Ranaka of Lamjung were any 'Rana Magars' because 'Rana' or 'Ranak' directly comes from Sanskrit word ‘Raja’ or 'Rajan' meaning 'man of royal tribe, subordinate ruler or military caste' and was a widely used title in the medieval South Asian history. (Sircar, 1966 : 272,275).

The name word ‘Raja’ or ‘Rajan’ also comes from Sanskrit root ‘rj’or ‘raj’ meaning ‘to be bright or to shine’ or ‘ranj’ meaning – ‘to become red or charming or attractive’ – to be dear to all who would later follow the person (Roy, 1994 : 103). And it seems parallel to ‘reg’, related to the Latin verb ‘regree’ that would mean ‘to direct, lead, guide or rule’.

We do not have any other ‘Rānakas or Rānes’ other than those three historical figures mentioned above  in the recorded history of Nepal.  But we have quite a number of Rana Magars who  have contributed  to the founding of Gorkha kingdom,  protecting and developing it into present day Nepal as well.

Other ‘Rānā Magars'

Gaṇgā Ram Rānā Bhusāl Magar also played a major role to install Drabya Shah as the King of Gorkha Kingdom on Wednesday Bhadra 24, 1616 Bikram Sambat[7]. He is described as one of  the prominent figures in the Gorkharājvānshāvali – which has 'the lone  distinction of being the only genealogical accounts of the Shah kings of Nepal' (Hasrat 1970:90). We do not know any other ‘Rana Magars’ prior to him in the history of Gorkha kingdom.

I grew up listening to ‘Gangā Rām Rānā Bhusal Magar’ and his descendants' oral (hi)stories from my grandparents and my grandparents had also heard those (hi)stories from their grandparents and so on.

Nar Bhupāl Shāh's son King Prithivi Nārāyān Shāh flayed ‘Kaji Jayant Rānā Gyāmi Magar’ as the latter had deserted the former - alive after subduing Nuwakot on Ashwin 15, 1801 Bikram Sambat.

After the death of his father king Singh Pratap Shah,  king Rana Bahadur Shah was coronated on December 17, 1777 and on that very day Sarvjit Rana Magar was also appointed  Mool Kaji (prime minister in today’s sense) of Nepal (Shah 1975:33).  On  the king’s uncle Bahadur Shah’s order later, Sarvjit Rana Magar was beheaded on 1835 Bhadra 19 Bikram Sambat. He was alleged to have been a paramour of the regent queen  Rajendra Laxmi.

The Kot Massacre began as soon as one of Jung Bahadur Rānā's men gunned down ‘General and Minister Abhimān Singh Rānā Magar’ on September 14, 1846. There are lot more ‘Rānā Magars’ and ‘Thāpa Magars’ to name in this list from Nepalese history. I have posted a brief note on Āles, Thāpās and Rānās on May 27, 2018 already. 

The word ‘Rana’ used to be ‘an official title’ offered to some ‘Magars’ (‘indigenous people’ in today’s terms) in the medieval Nepal. It was a popular title in entire south Asia during the middle ages.  It also comes from another Sanskrit word – rana literally battle or skirmish. So basically, Rānā later became an honorary earned title in the battle.

There is an interesting note by Eden Vansittart, in his own words , “ In former days any Thāpā who had lost three generations of ancestors in battle became Rānā,  but with the prefix of his Thāpā clan. Thus a Reshmī Thāpā would become a Reshmī Rānā”.  He even has offered an instance of it - “in the 5th Gurkhas, where a havildar, Lachman Thāpā, and a naick , Shamsher Rānā” being  the “descendants from two Thāpā brothers; but three generations of descendants from one  of these brothers having been killed in battle, Shamsher Rānā’s ancestors assumed the title of Rānā; Lachman Thāpā’s ancestors not having been killed in the battle for three generations, he remains a Thāpā" (Vansittart 1896: 109).  

The author Vansittart even has yet another interesting note that a progeny from a Khas  and Rana Magar woman would become  a Matwala Khas ‘Bhat Rana’ (Vansittart 1896: 90). There are quite a number of Rānā Bhāts in the western part of the country today.




References

Adhikary, Surya Mani 1997:  The Khasa Kingdom :A Trans-Himalayan Kingdom of the Middle Age – Nirala Publications, 2595 Kucha Chellan, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110 002

Bajracharya, Dhanavajra 2064 BS : Gopālarajvānshāvaliko Aitihāsik Vivechanā – Nepāl ra Asiyālī Anūsandhāna Kendrā, Tribhuvan Vishwāvidhyālayā, Kirtipur, Kathmandu.

Hasrat, Bikram Jit 1970: History of Nepal – as told by its own and contemporary chronicles – printed in India at the V. V. Research Institute Press by Dev Datta Shastri and published by the editor at 5, Krishan Nagar, Hosiyarpur, Punjab, India.

Pant, Mahes Raj & Sharma, Aishvarya Dhar 1977 : The Two Earliest Copper-plate Inscriptions from Nepal: Nepal Research Centre, Miscellaneous Papers No 12.

Roy, Kumkum  1994:  The Emergence of Monarchy in North India. Eighth  - Fourth Centuries BC, As Reflected in the Brahmanical Tradition. Oxford University Press.

Sarkar, D. C. 1966 : Indian Epigraphical Glossary – Motilal Banarasidass, Delhi, Varanasi, Patna.

Shah, Rishikesh 1975 : An Introduction to Nepal - Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu Nepal.  

Vansittart , Eden 1896: Notes on Nepal – Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing India.


*





[1] Some people write Rānā Maṇgars’
[2] “Many Magars were also employed in the army as they had family surnames such as  Thapa, Rana, Budha and Budhathoki” – Surya Mani Adhikary – The Khasa Kingdom :A Trans-Himalayan Kingdom of the Middle Age – 1997: 90.
[3] I am writing, not about the Rānā rulers of Nepal (1846 -1950) because prime minister Jung Bahadur Rana was originally a Kuṇwar who  received the hereditary title ‘Rānā’ from the king only on May 5, 1848 . We understand why he needed to obtain 'Rana' title.  It's also not my interest to write on those ‘Mahārānas or Rānās, the Sisodiya clan of Rajput of Mewar, India, who believe they descended from the mythical Rama of the solar dynasty.
[4] Sambat 119 mārgashir  shukladivā pūrmāsthāpitḻ
Shri gandigulmaknivāsina Shuvarakāra shrirāṇakasya
Mahārājdhirāja parameshwārashrinarendrādevabhattāraksya shriudayadevayo
Bhattārakayo ubhayarajya likhitamiti
[5] Sambat  189 bhādrapada (diva)se shrimashankara devarāya shri lumjungevāstavya Gaṇgā rāṇakeṇa likhitmidam
[6]
1) Shuvamastu |sambat 221  margashukladashaṃya | rājādhirāja parame-
2) Shwār, shrimatshivadevamaharajai | shri Ramdiva samtta vijayrajai |
3)Magwarvishaya |jhānteshwarabhattarakasa |tadhe gauthinpanchālikeṇa: chhepa
4)ram gwanda opalema || shri idā bhāvo nāyaka | shri dhaknap nāyaka | shri soha-
5) varane | Yete padhana vartniya |  
[7] There is another date also, Wednesday September 23, 1559 (Vansittart, 1896: 31) sounds incorrect to me.