[Mr. Trump spent the weekend in a round-robin series of phone calls with foreign leaders, clearly designed to settle nerves. But from Tokyo and Beijing to London and Berlin, foreign officials are watching the president’s false assertions with alarm, unsure of whether they can trust him and wondering whether that will undermine their dealings with Washington.]
By Mark Landler
 |
|
President Trump with the
British prime minister, Theresa May, before a joint press conference at the White House on
Friday.
Mrs. May tried to clarify Mr. Trump’s position on NATO. Credit Stephen
Crowley/The New York Times
|
WASHINGTON
— President Trump’s litany
of false statements and spurious claims has opened a national debate on the
fragility of a fact-based society. But overseas, where America’s allies and enemies
parse a president’s every word for signs of threat or reassurance, Mr. Trump’s
falsehoods have prompted a different kind of alarm.
From defense treaties to trade pacts, foreign
leaders are struggling to gauge whether they can depend on the United States to
honor its commitments. They are sizing up a fickle president whose erroneous
remarks on small issues cast doubt on what he might say on the big ones — the
future of NATO, say, or the Iran nuclear deal — that involve war and peace.
Mr. Trump spent the weekend in a round-robin
series of phone calls with foreign leaders, clearly designed to settle nerves.
But from Tokyo and Beijing to London and Berlin, foreign officials are watching
the president’s false assertions with alarm, unsure of whether they can trust
him and wondering whether that will undermine their dealings with Washington.
“If he’s telling lies on relatively
unimportant things, like the size of the crowd at his inauguration or whether
or not it rained on his parade, that’s not of great importance in the overall
scheme of things,” said Peter Westmacott, a former British ambassador to the
United States.
“But as I used to say to my staff,” he added,
“if I can’t rely on you to get the small things right, how can I count on you
to do so on things that really matter?”
For foreign leaders, particularly those who
depend on the United States for a security umbrella or as a market for their
goods, Mr. Trump’s unreliability sets up an acute diplomatic challenge. The
best they can do, in some cases, is to try to pin him down on basic facts or
nudge him in the right direction, as two European leaders, Chancellor Angela
Merkel of Germany and Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain, both did in recent
days.
In a phone call with Mr. Trump on Saturday,
Ms. Merkel objected to the president’s temporary ban on the entry of Muslims
from seven countries. To make her case, the chancellor’s spokesman said, Ms.
Merkel found herself explaining to him the Geneva Conventions, which oblige
countries to protect refugees of war on humanitarian grounds.
For Mrs. May, who visited the White House on
Friday, the goal was to clarify Mr. Trump’s position on NATO. During the
presidential campaign, he derided the alliance as obsolete and questioned
whether the United States would automatically come to the defense of its
members. More recently, he has said the United States will support it — a
pledge the prime minister claimed to have extracted from him in their
closed-door meeting.
“Mr. President, I think you said, you
confirmed that you’re 100 percent behind NATO,” Mrs. May said at a joint news
conference, looking at Mr. Trump, who did not mention the alliance in his
remarks.
Diplomats draw a distinction between Mr.
Trump’s plainly false assertions about crowd sizes or that millions of people
voted illegally in the election and his hints about lifting sanctions on Russia
or promises to rip up the Iran nuclear deal. The latter two fall into a more
standard category of positions taken by a political candidate that may later
change.
Mr. Westmacott said those were not what he
would call “barefaced lies.” “They are early statements of policy,” he said,
“perhaps not well thought through, which European capitals — and others which
might draw the wrong conclusions — need to see clarified.” Mrs. May’s meeting
with Mr. Trump, he said, was a useful first step in that process.
The trouble is, Mr. Trump’s willingness to
bend the truth could make it difficult to judge when the United States has
settled on firm policies on these issues.
Much of that may hinge on the influence
wielded by a cadre of senior cabinet officials, including Defense Secretary Jim
Mattis and Secretary of State-designate Rex W. Tillerson, who hold views that
differ from their boss’s and are regarded as steadier hands than him.
For France and Germany, the White House’s
embrace of what a senior adviser, Kellyanne Conway, called “alternative facts”
carries another chilling political dimension. Both countries are holding
elections this year in which far-right populist parties are mounting a vigorous
challenge to the political establishment.
Mr. Trump and his aides view his election
victory as part of a populist wave that swept through Britain, with its vote to
leave the European Union, and will now deluge the Continent.
Breitbart News, a far-right website until
recently run by Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, is setting up
outposts in Paris and Berlin, which French and German officials worry will
propagate “fake news” to try to swing the elections. Germany has already been
targeted by fake news operations, which officials believe emanate mostly from
Russia.
German officials said Ms. Merkel was
studiously pursuing a businesslike relationship with the president as part of
their shared call on Saturday. “She doesn’t want any differences to obscure the
key relationship we have with the United States,” said Peter Wittig, the German
ambassador to Washington.
That relationship, however, will be tested by
Mr. Trump’s cultivation of Russia, which has long subverted facts and truth in
its ideological struggle with the West. Some diplomats said the president’s
false statements blurred the line between the United States and authoritarian
states.
“America’s enemies feared it for dealing in
facts while they offered disinformation and conspiracy theories,” said Husain
Haqqani, Pakistan’s former ambassador to Washington. “All that changes when the
White House embraces the notion of ‘alternative facts.’”
“Conspiracy theories and disinformation put
out by America’s detractors gain greater currency once the distinction between
fact and false claim is eroded at the American end,” Mr. Haqqani said.
Presidents, to be sure, have long dissembled
on matters of national security. Lyndon B. Johnson was known for his
“credibility gap,” the historian Robert Dallek pointed out, while Richard M.
Nixon once ordered a devastating South Vietnamese military defeat in Cambodia
to be presented to the public as a victory. These falsehoods have a cumulative
effect on a president’s credibility, Mr. Dallek said, particularly when they
involve war and peace.
“The worst is when you’re lying to the public
and lives are being lost,” he said. “Those chickens come home to roost.”
Mr. Trump has been in office for only about
10 days. On multiple foreign policy fronts, he has done what he said he would
do in the campaign. He closed the borders to the seven Muslim-majority
countries. He pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, dealing a coup de
grâce to a 12-nation trade agreement. And he signed an executive order to build
a wall on the nation’s southern border, demanding again that Mexico pay for it.
Mexican officials, however, said they felt
betrayed by Mr. Trump because he posted his latest demand on Twitter on the
same day that a high-level delegation sent by President Enrique Peña Nieto
arrived in Washington to meet with White House staff members to smooth over
concerns about border security. Mr. Peña Nieto angrily canceled a trip to
Washington.
“Any world leader’s first audience is their
home audience,” said Jorge Guajardo, who was Mexico’s ambassador to China. “The
possibility of being humiliated by the president in your home country is
untenable.”
For some foreign policy experts, Mr. Trump’s
falsehoods are not themselves a cause for panic. Some recall the line
attributed to the 17th-century English diplomat Sir Henry Wotton: “An
ambassador is an honest gentleman sent to lie abroad for the good of his
country.” It is instead Mr. Trump’s stubborn adherence to assertions that are
so easily disproved that worries them.
“People can understand the tactical lie,”
said Eliot A. Cohen, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins
University and a vocal critic of Mr. Trump. “What’s unnerving is the sense that
when he lies, he actually believes it — the sense that he is fundamentally
unmoored from reality.”
Follow The New York Times’s politics and
Washington coverage on Facebook and Twitter, and sign up for the First Draft
politics newsletter.
