[Two posts here today: as they were email-received from Kathmandu, by two critical thinkers: Kalyan Dev Bhattarai and Bihari Krishna Shrestha on Nepalese politicians, their incompetence and corruption as well. Mr. Bhattarai has made the comment on a TV talk-show from New Delhi (please watch the video). And replying to Kalyan Dev Bhattarai, the other commentator Bihari Krishna Shrestha writes, "the sum and substance of Nepal ’s
political parties, that otherwise masquerade as ideologically inspired entities." - The Blogger. ]
By Kalyan Dev Bhattarai
Neither
the things are so simple nor the solution is so very easy here. The opinions of the three experts carry some
weight, at least, there is some truth in their expressions even though their prescription may not solve our problems. The crux of the problem lies in the honesty
of the corrupt leaders which is miles and miles away.I do not agree any community like Khas people(people of Caucasoid origin, Bhramins and Kshetriyas) are totally responsible for the current situation in the country but as the rulers they truly are. I would rather say - all the rulers who ruled the country since the last 280 -300 years or so were or are responsible for the current mess simply because they were or are corrupt and their only goal was or is to fulfill their vested interest: be it being in power and control the country's resources or collecting wealth, or in other words grabbing three Ps: power, pelf and prestige.
This
all happened during the Rana regime, the Shah regime or the Panchayat regime as well or
during the multi-party system today. The leaders are heavily corrupt nowadays. It is a fact, be it in
the name of religion or caste or politically or socially: the rulers of
the country were and are now exploiting, suppressing and marginalizing the Janajatis, Tharus, Madhesis, and Dalits etc. But the rulers could not
suppress Brahmins because of religion as the Brahmins are considered as
Pundits even though they are 'uneducated' - 'the uneducated pundits' - due to which even the poorest of the
poor Brahmins were less suppressed,less exploited and less marginalized than the average
Janajatis, Dalits, Madhesis etc. So to name
any caste people such as 'Bahuns and Kshetriys' as being responsible for the present day pathetic condition of the
country may be unjustifiable.
The
political revolutions in the country right from early 1950 to 2015 were not for the development of
the country nor for betterment of the
people but only to grab power so that the rulers could loot
the nation and fool the citizens. Until and unless we accept this bare and ugly truth it
will be impossible for us to understand various Tamasas (spectacles) staged by the
corrupt politicians of the country. The wrong notion of the few corrupt looters
(politicians) that they only have the right to rule the country because their
ancestor created the country by conquering many small states is so
false but still these crooks leave no stone unturned to sabotage People's
Movement: be it of 1950, 1990, 2006 or 2015 simply because they do not want to
lose their authority in politics. If we understand this ground reality of
Nepalese politics then only we will be able to understand why the agreement / understanding / MOU
signed between different groups : be it with Madhesis, Tharus, Janalati or even
individually with people like Dr. K. C and anti-corruption activist Sharda Ji
and the then governments, are today being breached by the government almost every time
and never implemented. The lack of basic honesty among the bunch of Nepalese politicians
and their inherent fear of losing their grip on country’s
politics, would never allow to solve any of the existing political, social and economic
problems of the country. Or else how
would you explain the fact that even after 65 years of so-called democracy, Dalit
community is not allowed to take water from the well of the villages and many women
treated inhumanly claiming them as witches etc. ?
The
group discussed federalism also and I agree the basic difference in the Indian type
of federalism and the proposed Nepalese federalism and it is not
panacea but the fact is that none of the Nepalese politicians do have any idea
of federalism, its requirements etc. But they agreed on the suggestion of INGOs as
they give them enough opportunity to create lucrative posts for their corrupt
cadres. I have written many articles against federalism, so I need not repeat
my explanation here again.
The
other reason for our failure is that Nepalese politicians do not
trust anybody, other than their henchmen who created the boundaries of the proposed states of the country. This is because they are not
politicians but the 'camouflaged dacoits' who have joined the politics to loot
the nation and fool the people.
Related Link: MAHENDRA, GIRIJA AND PRACHANDA: THE THREE NEPALESE VILLAINS THAT HARMED THE COUNTRY MOST
Related Link: MAHENDRA, GIRIJA AND PRACHANDA: THE THREE NEPALESE VILLAINS THAT HARMED THE COUNTRY MOST
*
By
Bihari Krishna Shrestha
It
is not difficult to join in with you in your impatience with the breed of
corrupt politicians who now rule our country.
But,
for a difference lately, the statue of historically the corruptest politician
in Nepal has finally been brought down at Birgunj, Saddam
Hussain style. It was such an obscene insult on the people of Nepal that of all the people who sacrificed their
lives in the service to the nation, this thug of a man should be immortalized
by erecting a statue at Nepal 's door to the outside world, Birgung. But we also know that the statue
itself was an act of servitude performed by fellow Nepali Congress Party thugs who were also
allowed to make enormous sums of money
themselves due to this chief thug's policy that in order to subdue any possible
opposition to you, you gotta get everybody around you corrupted too. This has
been the sum and substance of the Nepali Congress as a "political" party
as it has also been of other parties as well that otherwise masquerade as
ideologically inspired entities.
The
reason most of these well-meaning, ideologically inspired and devoted
politicians resort to corruption is because the voters are not and cannot be
made ideologically as inspired too due to their poverty and lack of education. The situation is made even worse for the people by the fact that the supporters of
these national leaders at the local level are no other than the feudal crooks
who have always dispossessed them of whatever they have in this chronically
feudalistic society.
So,
right from the start after the 1990 restoration of multiparty system, the so-called
democratic election had degenerated into buying and selling votes. Since this
became the basic rule of the game, just about everybody in the structure of a
political party had to become corrupt. The richer you are the greater your
capability of buying supporters and
voters in the communities. For your information, during the last couple of
years, I had the opportunity of addressing gatherings of senior politicians
which included ex-prime ministers and ex-ministers. When I told them, based on
my feudalism-based framework of analysis, that a successful politician in Nepal was necessarily a corrupt man, nobody was
angry; I was greeted by applause and resounding laughter. Since everybody in their ranks is
corrupt, there is no shame associated with being corrupt or branded as such
publicly.
Conceptually
speaking, it is the manifestation of the incompatibilities between the demands
of the Westminster-style democracy for rational voters and the chronically
feudalistic nature of the Nepali society that cannot provide them.
It
is this context against which I have been arguing for the redefinition of Nepal 's polity, because at the grassroots we are
able to promote robust democracies as evidenced by the brilliant successes of
forest user groups and mothers' groups. Briefly put, when the users themselves
get to participate in decision making, there is transparency of management and
accountability of leaders, the twin critical conditions of the genuinely
democratic setup. The point of departure for such far-reaching redefinition of
polity would, however, has to be demanding by its very nature. Briefly put again, we
will have to do away with the parasitic constituent assembly and the current
constitution making process, and that can be done only with the President
taking over the reins of administration for managing this transition. But that
does not seem to be on the cards.
As
our country is sandwiched between the two vast world powers, one would expect
that they help the small buffer with political development too. However, that
has not been the case either. India 's foreign policy, according to an Indian
analyst himself (S Shah, 2004) has always been designed to keep Nepal "intrinsically unstable". While
with the advent of Modi at the helm in India , that policy initially seemed to be changing.
But recent events have shown that that may not be the story yet after all. Besides,
with the Lipu Lekh controversy raging in Nepal , India is even seen as an "occupying power"
that is unlawfully in control of a part of Nepal 's sovereign territory. While China is hailed as a better neighbor, her help in
political development has been limited too, even as her own country's speedy
transition to being a world power was helped mainly by visionary leadership and
control of corruption.
So,
dear Kalyanjee, this is where our nation is stuck. So, cursing the politicians
is one of our bounden duties. But we have to look beyond and try to find out
how to bring about the redefinition of our polity without which there is very
little hope for getting rid of the vicious cycle in which our hapless people
are stuck.
*