[In a hastily assembled news
conference in Tehran on Thursday, hard-line analysts triumphantly
announced they would do the leader’s bidding by examining the agreement for any
devious legal tricks or loopholes the “arrogant” nations might be trying to
slip into the text.]
The tone of the letter might have seemed friendly to those not
familiar with the supreme leader’s style, said Hamidreza Taraghi, a political
analyst close to Ayatollah Khamenei.
“But the reaction was cold,” he said. “Notice how he only
thanked the negotiators but did not congratulate them on a victory. Our leader
is worried about several points in the deal.”
Prominent hard-liners, previously muzzled on the nuclear talks,
took the letter as a signal that they were free to criticize the deal.
In
a hastily assembled news conference in Tehran on Thursday, hard-line
analysts triumphantly announced they would do the leader’s bidding by examining
the agreement for any devious legal tricks or loopholes the “arrogant” nations
might be trying to slip into the text.
“We
are here to help the government,” said Foad Izadi, a professor of public
diplomacy at the University of Tehran . “But it is clear there are
serious problems with this agreement.”
While not wanting to get too far ahead of the supreme leader,
who will give a speech Saturday at the end of Ramadan, the hard-liners’
strategy has been to examine the accord to see whether it violates any of the
seven “major red lines” set by Ayatollah Khamenei in a statement published by
his office on June 23.
So when some Iranians danced in the streets on Tuesday
celebrating a deal that most saw as a way to finally get the economic sanctions
lifted, hard-liners turned off their phones, took up their magnifying glasses
and began checking the 159 pages of the plan drawn up in Vienna.
They were disturbed by what they found. “We quickly realized
that what we had feared all the time had become a reality,” said Alireza
Mataji, an organizer of the Tehran event. “If Iran agrees with this our nuclear
industry will be handcuffed for many years to come.”
In the list of major red lines, Ayatollah Khamenei had said that
he strongly opposed long-term restrictions on Iran ’s nuclear program. “Despite United States insistence, we do not accept
10, 12-year-long restrictions, and the negotiators are already informed about
an acceptable time-frame,” he said.
In the “Joint Plan of Action”
presented by Iran and the world powers on
Tuesday, the hard-liners say, many of the restrictions go far beyond 10 or 12
years.
Several parts of the deal end after 10 years. But it calls for a
15-year restriction on any enrichment activities in the underground bunker
complex of Fordo. Iran is also barred from
accumulating heavy water or building a heavy water reactor for a period of 15
years. Nor will it be allowed to reprocess any spent fuel or conduct research
on spent fuel.
“That they constantly repeat time frames of 15 years or 25 years
for some topics is not accepted,” Ayatollah Khamenei said on June 23, spelling
out red line No. 7, according to his office.
The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United
Nations nuclear watchdog, will monitor the production of uranium ore
concentrate for 25 years, the document says.
In
the same statement, Ayatollah Khamenei stressed that he does not accept
verification by the atomic agency, red line No. 5. “They claim that the
I.A.E.A. must confirm,” he said. “What a nonsense statement is it?”
At the news conference on
Thursday, Mr. Izadi said he had counted a total of 19 red lines by the supreme
leader. “Out of those, 18 and a half have been crossed,” he said. “They wanted
to completely close Fordo, but we have managed to keep it open, without any
enrichment unfortunately. That is one achievement.”
A handful of reporters, all
writing for hard-line news outlets, wrote down every word.
In the statement, Ayatollah Khamenei ruled out the inspection of
military sites. Red line No. 6, his office noted. “I never accept
unconventional inspections or interrogation of individuals,” Ayatollah Khamenei
said. “I have already asserted that no inspection of military sites can ever be
done.”
Under the agreement, international inspectors should be granted
access to suspicious nuclear facilities in a maximum of 24 days, even if they
are military sites.
At the news conference, a professor of political science and
international relations, Mohammad Sadegh Koshki, said that even a confirmation
of the deal by the United Nations Security Council is a bad move for Iran . Iran ’s government says that a new
resolution would make it harder for the United States Congress to reject the
deal.
But Mr. Koshki, who regularly appears on state television, said
that it would turn the permanent members of the Security Council into
arbitrators, ultimately deciding whether Iran was sticking to its
commitments.
“How can Iran complain against the people it
made a deal with when they occupy the permanent seats of the Security Council,”
he said. “The text is also full of ambiguous words regarding the lifting of the
sanctions. We must study this very carefully.”
It is possible that the red lines were part of Iran ’s negotiating strategy,
designed to get the best possible deal, and will now be forgotten, said one
analyst, who insisted on not being named in discussing the supreme leader’s
role. “Mr. Khamenei is the ultimate balancer of Iran ’s factions,” the analyst said,
“don’t take the red lines too seriously.”
He added: “This entire process was started by the supreme
leader. He has monitored and guided these talks all these years. He knows this
is the best deal he could get.”