[Thousands of people stormed an electricity substation on
Friday near the state capital, Lucknow , ransacking offices and taking several workers hostage
for 18 hours until the police intervened Saturday morning, said a state utility
official, Narendra Nath Mullick.]
LUCKNOW, India — Thousands of people enraged by power cuts during an extreme heat wave rioted across northern India, setting electricity substations on fire and taking power company officials hostage, officials said Saturday.
The impoverished state of Uttar Pradesh has never had
enough power for its 200 million people, and many receive only a few hours a
day under normal conditions, while 63 percent of homes have no access to
electricity at all.
But recent temperatures that soared to 117 degrees
Fahrenheit have caused the demand for power to spike at 11,000 megawatts — far
higher than the state’s capacity of 8,000 megawatts — setting off blackouts
that shut down fans, city water pumps and air-conditioners.
Thousands of people stormed an electricity substation on
Friday near the state capital, Lucknow , ransacking offices and taking several workers hostage
for 18 hours until the police intervened Saturday morning, said a state utility
official, Narendra Nath Mullick.
Elsewhere, an angry crowd set fire to an electricity
substation in Gonda, 112 miles southeast of Lucknow . It took three hours for firefighters to put out the
flames on Friday. Another substation was set on fire in Gorakhpur , 200 miles southeast of Lucknow .
Uttar Pradesh’s chief minister, Akhilesh Yadav, said
officials were trying to buy power from other states, though they were also
facing shortages amid the extreme heat.
Power was largely restored to most areas by Saturday
afternoon, leading dozens of people who were still protesting outside the
Indira Nagar substation in Lucknow to go home.
Residents had been particularly angry about the power
cuts after receiving reliable supplies through the Indian elections, which
ended on May 16. Since then, only some regions have been guaranteed unbroken
power supplies, while others have received little to no supply.
*
FACEBOOK UNDER FIRE FOR TEMPORARILY BLOCKING PAGES IN PAKISTAN
[“Facebook
claims to be in favor of free speech, and talks about protecting political
expression, but they are not,” said Shahzad Ahmad of the group Bytes for All
Pakistan, which campaigns for Internet freedom and has gone to court several
times seeking to lift government restrictions in Pakistan ."For
the sake of their own profits and business, they are caving in to anything the
government demands.”]
By Declan Waslh and Salman Masood
Members of the band, Laal, whose members have frequently
spoken out against the Taliban, confirmed that their Facebook page, which had
over 400,000 “likes,” had been blocked.
Following an outcry on social media and inquiries by
reporters to the Pakistani government and to Facebook, the government reversed
itself and Facebook restored access to Laal’s page.
But advocates said late on Friday that at least six other
Facebook pages that promoted progressive debate in Pakistan and that had been blocked during the week remained
inaccessible.
“Facebook claims to be in favor of free speech, and talks
about protecting political expression, but they are not,” said Shahzad Ahmad of
the group Bytes for All Pakistan, which campaigns for Internet freedom and has
gone to court several times seeking to lift government restrictions in Pakistan ."For the sake of their own profits and business,
they are caving in to anything the government demands.”
A spokeswoman for Facebook in London said the company’s policy was to adhere to local laws,
and that it blocked the pages after receiving an official request from the
Pakistan Telecommunications Authority, which regulates Internet content in Pakistan .
“While we never remove this type of content from the site
entirely, like most Internet services, we may restrict people from accessing it
in the countries where it is determined to be illegal,” the spokeswoman said,
adding that questions about why specific pages were blocked were “best
addressed to the authorities who issue these orders.”
The spokeswoman declined to be named, citing company
policy.
Facebook was banned entirely in Pakistan for several months in 2010, during a controversy over a
page that encouraged people to draw cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
The company says it regularly weeds out pages that promote
hate or extremism. According to a report published on its website, Facebook
restricted access to 162 pieces of content in Pakistan between July and December 2013, and many more in some
other countries, including India , where it restricted access to more than 4,700 pages in
the same period.
But activists said on Friday that the latest blocks in Pakistan affected pages that spoke out against extremism, while
several extremist pages in the country were left untouched.
“This is ridiculous,” said Taimur Rahman, the lead singer
of Laal, speaking before the ban on his group’s page was lifted. “None of our
content could be construed as anti-state or anti-religious, in any shape or
form.”
The Facebook actions come at a time when freedom of
speech is under increasing pressure in Pakistan . Extremists have been bringing criminal accusations of
blasphemy against journalists, and the army has been cracking down on criticism
of itself in the media. The government media regulator suspended broadcasts of the country’s most popular news
channel, Geo News, on Friday and fined it $104,000, on accusations that Geo
News had defamed the military’s Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency.
Ale Natiq, 31, the administrator of the Urdu-language
page Roshni Pakistan , speculated that the military was behind the blocking of
the page this week. “We’re not anti-state or anti-religion,” Mr. Natiq said.
“But we’ve been very vocal on the Baluchistan issue, which is sensitive to the military, so that might
have done it.”
Several activists questioned why Facebook had not blocked
other Pakistani pages that incite sectarian violence, religious extremism or
hatred against minorities. As examples, they pointed to pages administrated by supporters of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat,
a notorious sectarian groups that has supported attacks on Shiites; the
sectarian militant group Lashkar e Jhangvi;and the
Red Mosque, where a violent stand-off between extremists and
government forces in 2007 left over 100 people dead, and where a recently
opened library is named for Osama bin Laden.
“These pro-Taliban pages are spewing hatred, and we are
the people they shut down,” said Mr. Rahman, the singer. “It’s insanity.”
Facebook officials say that they resist censorship as
much as possible, but their leverage is limited in countries like Pakistan where the governmentimposes
constraints with
little public debate.
Declan
Walsh reported from London and
Salman Masood from Islamabad