February 13, 2014

U.S. AMBASSADOR MEETS WITH NARENDRA MODI IN GUJARAT

[In 2005, the United States imposed a visa ban on Mr. Modi over questions about his role in religious riots in his state in 2002, in which at least 1,000 people were killed, most of them Muslims. He has denied any wrongdoing, and a Supreme Court investigative team declined to bring charges against him in 2012, saying there wasn’t enough evidence.]

Gujarat Government/Handout/European Pressphoto Agency
Nancy J. Powell, United States ambassador to India, with Narendra Modi, chief minister of Gujarat, at a meeting in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, on Thursday.
NEW DELHI — The United States ambassador to India, Nancy J. Powell, met with Narendra Modi, chief minister of Gujarat, at his residence in Gujarat’s capital on Thursday, the American Embassy in New Delhi said in a statement.
The meeting in Gandhinagar with Mr. Modi, who is also the Bharatiya Janata Party’s candidate for prime minister, was part of Ms. Powell’s “outreach to senior leaders of India’s major political parties in advance of the upcoming national elections” in May, the statement said.
Bharat Lal, the resident commissioner in Gujarat, who attended the meeting, said Mr. Modi and Ms. Powell discussed a variety of issues, including security, defense, economic cooperation and education. The American troop withdrawal from Afghanistan and private-sector investment in Gujarat were also discussed, he said, declining to reveal more details.
It was the first time that a United States government official of Ms. Powell’s rank had visited Mr. Modi.
In 2005, the United States imposed a visa ban on Mr. Modi over questions about his role in religious riots in his state in 2002, in which at least 1,000 people were killed, most of them Muslims. He has denied any wrongdoing, and a Supreme Court investigative team declined to bring charges against him in 2012, saying there wasn’t enough evidence.
A State Department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki, said in a briefing in Washington on Tuesday that the meeting did not reflect a change of policy with regard to Mr. Modi’s visa.
The Bharatiya Janata Party leader in Parliament, Arun Jaitley, said in a statement Thursday that he regarded the meeting as “an internal corrective of the U.S. administration.”
Seshadri Chari, a national executive member of the party, said that the fact that Ms. Powell chose to meet Mr. Modi before rival political candidates was a sure sign of Mr. Modi’s dominance in advance of the national elections this spring.
“In the next round of meetings, she might meet other candidates, but she must have made an assessment that Mr. Modi is first among equals,” he said.  “If there are 10 candidates that qualify for prime minster, Mr. Modi comes first.”
He sought to play down the visa ban, calling it the “nuts and bolts” of a more important question, which is that of India’s relationship with the United States.
Mr. Chari said that the meeting was a step forward in India-United States relations and that Mr. Modi’s rising political prospects would continue to shift the course of his relationship with the United States.
“When a person becomes prime minister, I don’t think the United States would be foolish enough to think otherwise than issuing a visa,” he said.
Nida Najar is a freelance writer based in New Delhi. Follow her on Twitter @nidanajar.
@ The New York Times

ANDHRAPRADESH LAWMAKERS TURN VIOLENT AFTER TELANGANA BILL IS INTRODUCED

[Seconds after Mr. Shinde introduced the bill, the Lok Sabha was adjourned in an attempt to forestall any protests from the Andhra Pradesh contingent. But once the lawmakers from the southern state realized what Mr. Shinde was doing, they rushed to the well of the house and broke the microphone of the speaker, as well as a table and a window.]
By Hari Kumar and Vishnu Varma
NEW DELHI — Violence disrupted the lower house of Parliament on Thursday, as lawmakers from Andhra Pradesh, upset at a plan to divide their state, broke the secretary general’s microphone and sprayed a chemical that sent some people to the hospital.
The fracas in the Lok Sabha began immediately after Sushil Kumar Shinde, India’s home minister, introduced a central government bill to create a new state, Telangana, that would be carved out of the existing southern state.
Residents who live in the coastal Seemandhra region of Andhra Pradesh have staged demonstrations against the Telangana plan, fearing the loss of river waters flowing from the Telangana region and access to education and jobs in Hyderabad, the state capital.
The bill is expected to pass Parliament, given that it has the support of both the governing Congress party and the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party. But Andhra Pradesh lawmakers have vowed to keep Parliament from passing the bill by preventing the legislature from functioning.
Seconds after Mr. Shinde introduced the bill, the Lok Sabha was adjourned in an attempt to forestall any protests from the Andhra Pradesh contingent. But once the lawmakers from the southern state realized what Mr. Shinde was doing, they rushed to the well of the house and broke the microphone of the speaker, as well as a table and a window.
A junior minister, R.P.N. Singh, told reporters that one of the lawmakers sprayed some kind of gas or pepper spray on other members. Lawmakers were seen holding handkerchiefs to their faces as they left the Parliament building. Ambulances were called to Parliament and took some legislators to a nearby hospital.
“This has shamed us,” Meira Kumar, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, told reporters. “Today what has happened is a blot.”
India’s parliamentary minister, Kamal Nath, said he would ask Ms. Kumar to punish the lawmakers who started the violence.
Some lawmakers accused Venugopal Reddy, a Telugu Desam Party lawmaker from Andhra Pradesh, of brandishing a knife, which he denied in an interview with NDTV.
He admitted that he broke the secretary general’s microphone but said that he would not apologize.
“I have a lot of respect for the democracy,” he said. But he accused other lawmakers of trying to physically block him from registering his objections after the bill was introduced.
“At the time when they forcibly want to introduce the bill, what is the democracy?” he asked.
@ The New York Times