January 18, 2014

BREAKING STEREOTYPES, MUSLIM WOMEN DISCUSS SEXUALITY AT JAIPUR LITERARY FESTIVAL

[Even Urvashi Bhutalia, feminist and publisher, who moderated the session, was surprised to see so many people in attendance, eager to hear how stifled voices from conservative countries are breaking stereotypical norms and getting away from veils, to tell their own unique tales. ]

By PTI - JAIPUR
When women writers from Islamic countries discuss sexuality and erotic poems, taboos and male dominance, and mull over breaking free from conservative norms, the audience is bound to be large.

At the Jaipur Literary Festival (JLF) Saturday, the hall of the "Baithak" venue was flooded with people eager to hear discussions at the session "Behind the Veil: Women Writers of the Islamic World".

Even Urvashi Bhutalia, feminist and publisher, who moderated the session, was surprised to see so many people in attendance, eager to hear how stifled voices from conservative countries are breaking stereotypical norms and getting away from veils, to tell their own unique tales.

Bhutalia was in conversation with four authors: Shereen Feki, author of "Sex and the Citadel: Intimate Life in a Changing Arab World", author of "The Exiled" Fariba Hachtroudi, Somalia-born Nadifa Mohamed, and Turkish author Bejan Matur.

"I have spent five years in the Arab world talking about sex. Many of you might think this is the best job in the world," Feki told the audience here, in a lighter vein.

Feki's parents moved to Canada and as she was born there, so she never felt any connection with the Arab world till the September 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre in the US.

"I had never thought much about the Arab world till 9/11. It was then that I decided to know more about it," said Feki, who was a journalist and has covered HIV-related stories from the Arab world.

"There were so many taboos around sex that it was hard to tackle," she said.

Her book throws light on the sexual preferences of women from conservative Arab countries, where women opened up to her and talked about their sex lives. Though she did speak to men about it too, they have not featured in the book.

And she strongly believes that the behaviour of society is strongly related also to what happens behind the closed doors of bedrooms.

"Sexuality is a rich way of looking at society. What happens inside bedrooms is related to outside life. If we don't allow freedom in private lives, it won't be achieved in the public sphere," she said.

Elaborating how a free body is an essential ingredient of a free mind was Hachtroudi, who left Iran when she was 12. After writing extensively on Iran for three years, this journalist felt it was necessary for her to be inside the country to feel what it was like, back home.

"I was lucky, my friends say. Some say I was a fool, because I chose to take the Afghanistan border to enter Iran. But once I was there, it changed my life," she told the audience.

"The power men want to have over women is the biggest obstacle in our society. Prostitution in Iran began around 1985-86 when the economy was crippled by war (Iran-Iraq)," she added, saying she has written erotic poetry.

Another thing that left women powerless was the decision taken during the Iranian Revolution, when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini took away women's right to participate in politics.

"During (Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi )Shah's regime, women had power to vote and they were in the sphere of politics," she said.

She said she is now spearheading a programme to encourage people to express themselves, creatively.

While it is believed that a country becomes modern by adapting to western ways, Feki emphasised the need to "change thinking" to be modern.

"Modernity is not an economic weapon, but a system of changing thinking and growing," she said.


[The protesters are now focused on an election set for next month that Ms. Yingluck called in a failed attempt to quell the protests. Critics believe that holding the election will extend the dominance of the Shinawatra family and instead want to install an unelected “people’s council” that would guide the country through changes before elections could be held again.]


By Thomas Fuller 
BANGKOK — An attack on antigovernment protesters in Bangkok on Friday, most likely with a grenade, killed one person and injured more than 30, intensifying tensions in the city as a dwindling but dedicated core of protesters continues to block access to a number of government buildings and major intersections.
The explosion occurred in broad daylight in central Bangkok as the protesters were marching down a street, leaving people dazed and bleeding. It remained unclear hours after the attack who was responsible, with the protesters blaming the government but refusing to allow a forensics team to investigate the site fully because, they said, they do not trust the police.
“The use of a war weapon is of particular concern,” said Sunai Phasuk, a senior researcher in Thailand at Human Rights Watch. “Thailand cannot allow this cycle to spin into something more dangerous.”
The episode was not the bloodiest during the protests — eight people have been killed, and about 500 have been injured, in the past two months — but it was among the most brash, occurring not far from the city’s main shopping district.
Tensions were already on the rise after a series of shooting attacks at the protest sites in recent days, as well as small explosions at the homes of two leaders of a political opposition party that supports the protesters. The attack on Friday came as protesters continued for the fifth day to try to “shut down” Bangkok, blocking key intersections in the central business district.
The leader of the protests, Suthep Thaugsuban, who was near the explosion but quickly fled, cried when recounting the episode to his supporters, seizing on the assault as another reason for Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra to step down.
“Leave now, leave immediately,” he said, asserting that the government was behind the attack. “How many people did you expect to be killed?”
Ms. Yingluck urged the police to quickly make arrests in the attack, according to The Associated Press, saying she was opposed to any use of force.
Her government, buttressed by the support of voters in northern Thailand who have propelled her party to successive electoral victories, has been besieged by protesters in Bangkok for the past two months. This week, officials worked from the relative safety of a military office on the city’s outskirts.
Ms. Yingluck and her brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, a billionaire who was removed as prime minister in a 2006 military coup, are the main targets of the protesters.
The protesters are now focused on an election set for next month that Ms. Yingluck called in a failed attempt to quell the protests. Critics believe that holding the election will extend the dominance of the Shinawatra family and instead want to install an unelected “people’s council” that would guide the country through changes before elections could be held again.
In what appeared to be one of the most explicit acts of sabotage before the planned Feb. 2 elections, protesters on Friday cut the electricity at the company where ballots are printed.
Although most of Bangkok, a sprawling capital of well over 10 million people, has been unaffected by the demonstrations, violence this week in and around the protest areas has underlined a vacuum of authority and fed a sense of insecurity in the city.
The police are nearly absent from the protest sites. There have been at least eight episodes of gunfire since the beginning of the year related to the protests, half of them resulting in injuries.
This week explosive devices were used to attack the houses of two high-profile politicians who belong to the main opposition party: the governor of Bangkok, Sukhumbhand Paribatra, and the head of the Democrat Party, Abhisit Vejjajiva. No one was injured.
Adding to the sense of insecurity and the risk of further violence are signs of divided loyalties among security forces, a constant feature of eight years of political turmoil.
Three navy commandos were arrested this week after police officers at a checkpoint discovered weapons, including one fitted with a silencer, in their vehicle. The men had “accreditation” issued by one of the factions of protesters, according to the police. Their reported affiliation with protesters has not yet been addressed by the navy. The police were quoted in the Thai news media as saying that the commandoes were working as armed guards for the protesters.
Protesters have numerous grievances against Ms. Yingluck and her governing party, arguing that the government has ignored the needs of southern Thailand, that corruption is rife and that Mr. Thaksin has overshadowed the country’s king. Supporters of the governing party, meanwhile, say they are loyal to it because of policies such as universal health care, microloans to people in rural areas and a fierce crackdown on drug dealers.
Protesters, especially those from southern Thailand, say they will continue their demonstrations until Ms. Yingluck is defeated.
Suwannee Chantamatr, 61, a protester from the south who witnessed Friday’s attack, said she would not be deterred.
“I feel like it’s dangerous out there,” she said. “But my heart is calling. My heart is with the nation, and the nation is calling me out to the street.”