[Communities believe
that to break the tradition would bring devastating bad luck: crops would fail,
animals would die, snakes would fall from the ceiling. The imagined
consequences are so dire that few dare to test stopping, even when the practice
brings deadly consequences. Women have died from asphyxiation or burned to
death when they built fires in the cramped sheds to shield from the Himalayan
winter. Others have suffered rape and deadly snakebites and jackal attacks.]
ACHHAM, Nepal — Next to an abandoned stable now used to store
firewood, a reluctant young mother crouched to pass through a tiny door into a
dark, musty room. Barely looking at her baby, she glanced around the mud walls
at the place she was raped. It was not strange for her to be in this space,
haunted as it was with violent memories, because she still sleeps here each
month when she is menstruating.
Chaupadi is the ritual
isolation of menstruating women. It is a tradition practiced in Achham, a
district in the remote Far Western region of Nepal. Each month, women sleep
outside their homes in sheds called “goths,” in stables or in caves. They are
deemed impure and treated as untouchable. They eat separately from their
families, cannot enter their homes and often have to wash at a separate tap.
The practice has roots
in Hinduism, though many scholars in Kathmandu, the capital, consider chaupadi
a bastardization of the Vedic precept that women sleep apart from their
husbands during menstruation. But in Achham the majority of women still
practice this monthly separation.
Communities believe
that to break the tradition would bring devastating bad luck: crops would fail,
animals would die, snakes would fall from the ceiling. The imagined
consequences are so dire that few dare to test stopping, even when the practice
brings deadly consequences. Women have died from asphyxiation or burned to
death when they built fires in the cramped sheds to shield from the Himalayan
winter. Others have suffered rape and deadly snakebites and jackal attacks.
It takes two days to
drive to Achham from Kathmandu, and most people don’t bother. The impoverished
district is better known for sending migrants south to India than for drawing
more cosmopolitan Nepalis in. It is in this isolation that the chaupadi
practice became entrenched.
The practice has
gained some national attention and is widely denounced by women’s rights
activists. In 2005, the Supreme Court of Nepal deemed the practice illegal, but
the distant court decision has had little impact on the daily lives of women in
Achham.
More influential has
been the slow spread of awareness that comes with increased connectivity. The
construction of roads and the implementation of solar power in remote villages
have led to the slow permeation of televisions and cellphones that offer a
window into other worlds where chaupadi is not taken for granted.
Countless
organizations have also campaigned against the practice through radio shows,
awareness campaigns in schools and town meetings, and by declaring villages
chaupadi free.
But social change is
plodding because faith in the tradition runs deep. In only a few villages have
women started sleeping inside when they are menstruating, but in many villages
there is a growing discussion about the monthly ostracization. Some girls who
hear messages in school want to quit the tradition but are restricted by more
conservative parents. Some families stopped the practice, but when bad luck
followed, it reignited their faith in the old ways.
And some, like the
young mother who was raped, cannot imagine life without it. “Things are done
according to tradition here,” she said.
If she has a daughter,
she said, “I won’t do anything different — I’ll send her to the goth.”
@ The New York Times
IN DELHI DEUBA SAYS, ‘NO WIDESPREAD ANTI-INDIA SENTIMENT IN NEPAL’
IN DELHI DEUBA SAYS, ‘NO WIDESPREAD ANTI-INDIA SENTIMENT IN NEPAL’
[His remarks come at a time when sections of the NC,
considered a traditional ally of India, have engaged in rhetoric against Indian
‘interventionism’. The party’s president, Sushil Koirala, is known to harbour
resentment against India for what he perceives as Delhi’s unwillingness to
support him to become Prime Minister earlier this year, though it was former PM
Baburam Bhattarai and the Madhesi parties who rejected his name.]
By
Prashant Jha & Sujay Mehdudia
Wrapping up his five-day India visit, Nepal’s three-time Prime Minister and Nepali Congress
(NC) senior leader, Sher Bahadur Deuba, has brushed aside the perception that there
was widespread ‘anti-India sentiment’ in Nepal. For its part, India, which laid
out the red carpet for Mr. Deuba, has sent a clear signal of support to
‘democratic forces’ and asked NC to get its act together.
“Nepal has an open border with
India. Many Nepalis, particularly Hindus, come to India for pilgrimage. Nepalis
come here to study. And everyone in Nepal, including my wife, watches Hindi
films," said Mr. Deuba at an interaction with reporters at the Press Club
of India in the capital. He added that India has had a role in all major
political changes in Nepal — in 1951, 1990, and in 2005 when parties and
Maoists signed an understanding in Delhi.
His remarks come at a time when
sections of the NC, considered a traditional ally of India, have engaged in
rhetoric against Indian ‘interventionism’. The party’s president, Sushil
Koirala, is known to harbour resentment against India for what he perceives as
Delhi’s unwillingness to support him to become Prime Minister earlier this
year, though it was former PM Baburam Bhattarai and the Madhesi parties who
rejected his name.
India’s
message
India’s key message was that Nepal
must hold ‘elections by November 2013’ in order to consolidate ‘multi-party
democracy and republican system’. For this purpose, ‘Nepal’s president, the
interim election government and parties’ had to work together. “Everyone, from
top to bottom in the Indian establishment, wants us to have elections. Any
doubt in this regard is now dispelled”, said a Nepali political source.
In what could be seen as an effort
to ‘balance’ the Maoist strength in Nepali polity, India also conveyed to Mr.
Deuba the ‘need for democratic and moderate forces to maintain unity’. NC, the
former PM was told, ‘must bear responsibility of taking forward the democratic
process in Nepal’ as it was the ‘bulwark of democracy’. Fractured between Mr.
Koirala and Mr. Deuba’s factions, India also asked NC to ‘remain united, and
not publicly voice their intra-party differences in this crucial phase of
democratic transition’.
At the same time, Delhi alerted the
NC to rising aspirations of marginalised groups. Interlocutors are understood
to have told the former NC PM that it was ‘necessary to work with other
democratic forces for inclusive political and social change’. Newer political
groups fighting for inclusion have closer ties the Maoists, and the NC is seen
as upholding ‘status quo’. NC has been lobbying with India to use its leverage
with Madhesi parties to switch sides, while India has reiterated its message
that the onus lies on NC to reach out and work with other forces.
Congress-Congress
ties
But Mr Deuba was ‘very happy’ with
the reception he got in New Delhi. He met PM Manmohan Singh, UPA chairperson
Sonia Gandhi, External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, Commerce and Industry
Minister Anand Sharma, National Security Advisor Shiv Shanker Menon, and
leaders from other political parties.
The meeting with Ms. Gandhi, who was
accompanied by senior leader Karan Singh and Mr. Sharma, assumes significance
as she had not met two earlier Maoist visitors from Nepal — Maoist chairman
Pushpa Kamal Dahal last month, and former PM Baburam Bhattarai in October 2011.
When asked about whether any meaning
could be read in this, a senior Indian official source told The Hindu,
“It indicates that the Congress party and the Nepali Congress have age-old
strong ties, and those relations are still given high priority. The UPA chair
is not a public employee and is free to choose who she meets.” Ms. Gandhi had
also met NC president, Mr. Koirala, when he visited Delhi in 2011.