October 29, 2012

FAMOUS FOR GAFFES, A CANDIDATE IN MISSOURI LEARNS TO WATCH HIS WORDS

[Butin the waning days of this tight race, which may decide which party controls the Senate, Mr. Akin is traveling the state exchanging handshakes and hugs with supporters. He appears to be unperturbed by his status as a political outcast and is hoping to show that he is not the extremist that many people believe him to be. ] Buildings Take Birds From the Sky


Add caption
WEST PLAINS, Mo. — Todd Akin was revving up his stump speech here the other day, recycling an applause line that Senator Claire McCaskill was President Obama’s “strong right arm” when a supporter seconded him with a disparaging description of her: “lap dog.”

Mr. Akin, a six-term Republican congressman who is hoping to unseat Ms. McCaskill in the race for Senate in Missouri, paused midsentence, pointed to the man and, with a mischievous grin, said: “I don’t use that word ‘dog’ anymore. It gets me in trouble.”
Hinting at the recent uproar over a remark in which he compared Ms. McCaskill’s actions to those of a dog, Mr. Akin was showing off a persona that he has embraced on the campaign trail: folksy and playful, careful yet still edgy.

With just two words — “legitimate rape” — uttered in a television interview that was broadcast in August, Mr. Akin lost his advantage in the race, was abandoned by his own party leaders and caricatured by Democrats as a general in the so-called Republican war on women.
But in the waning days of this tight race, which may decide which party controls the Senate, Mr. Akin is traveling the state exchanging handshakes and hugs with supporters. He appears to be unperturbed by his status as a political outcast and is hoping to show that he is not the extremist that many people believe him to be.
This is a softer and less confrontational Mr. Akin than what most of the country has seen.
Rape and abortion are subjects he rarely brings up. (He was defending his no-exceptions opposition to abortion when he got in trouble for saying that women’s bodies could automatically prevent pregnancy in cases of “legitimate rape.”) Gone is his us-versus-the-establishment language. And while he addresses some of his more incendiary remarks head on — like his statement equating federal student loans to Stage 3 cancer — he tends to stick with more rehearsed themes that appeal to his conservative base: less government, more freedom and God.
A poll released on Saturday suggested that his strategy might be working. The survey, conducted by Mason Dixon for The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, News 4 in St. Louis and The Kansas City Star, showed the race to be essentially tied, with Ms. McCaskill holding an edge, 45 percent to 43 percent. The poll had a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
Mr. Akin fosters the “aw shucks” demeanor of the Midwest, drawing out his words like an elementary school teacher. He uses jokes to break the ice — “I’m willing to take a few questions as long as they’re not real hard,” he told one audience. He often invokes patriotic history, telling stories of George Washington, Patrick Henry and Thomas A. Edison. He relishes symbolism and told a group in Ava, Mo., about a bald eagle he saw on the drive to meet them. “Does the eagle remind you of freedom?” he cried.
“Yeah!” they shouted back.
Even staunch conservatives who almost certainly will vote for Mr. Akin want to meet him in person to reassure themselves of their decision.
“I thought I better look at him to see if he’s as crazy as they think he is,” said Dannie Thompson, 55, a City Council member in Salisbury, Mo., who first met Mr. Akin on Wednesday at a dinner at a country-style restaurant in nearby Moberly.
Mr. Thompson was smitten. Mr. Akin was friendly and approachable, Mr. Thompson said, took interest in what he had to say and explained himself well.
“He wasn’t trying to use college words to a hillbilly like me,” Mr. Thompson said.
Mr. Akin went from table to table to greet people. He excused himself for reaching over a woman and then turned to her and offered his hand. “Hi, Bonnie,” he said. “Nice to see ya.”
During his speech, the first noticeable reaction from the crowd came as he spoke about what he thought was the secret to America’s greatness, increasing his cadence and pointing a finger in the air.
“I believe that secret really starts with a visionary idea that there is a creator — ”
“Amen,” a woman interjected.
“— that blessed us with life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
Mr. Akin does not speak from a script. But he has taught himself to be disciplined when he talks.
“I’m trying to be pretty careful in choosing my words, you can bet that’s true,” he said in an interview.
Mr. Akin begins almost every speech by reminding people that Ms. McCaskill was an early supporter of Mr. Obama during his first presidential run. He says she voted most of the time for legislation that Mr. Obama supported, and he highlights her support for the health care law. In a state where the president’s poll numbers have sagged, Mr. Akin’s best path to victory might be to make sure that Mitt Romney’s supporters also check his name on the ballot.
He gets crowds most riled up when he talks of the millions of dollars in federal subsidies received by housing companies tied to Ms. McCaskill’s husband, or of the sexual harassment lawsuit pending against one of her husband’s companies.
“That’s why you see the magician trick,” he told a group of mostly older people in Hannibal, twiddling his right hand next to his face while reaching down with his left. “Look over here while I put this hand in your wallet.”
Ms. McCaskill’s campaign has denied any wrongdoing and condemned the attacks. It has noted that the senator has voted against some of the spending bills involved, and that her husband’s companies were but a handful of thousands that received the financing, which was used for maintenance at affordable housing developments. The lawsuit is against an apartment complex in Springfield, Ill., where neither Ms. McCaskill nor her husband, whose company owns the complex, play a role.
Caitlin Legacki, a spokeswoman for Ms. McCaskill, said it was “unfortunate that his campaign has taken such a desperate tone and have leveled such inaccurate personal attacks.”
In turn, Mr. Akin has accused his opponent of using similar tactics. Beyond his controversial statements, he has been peppered with questions about his numerous arrests during anti-abortion protests decades ago. The McCaskill campaign’s advertising, Mr. Akin said, “is trying to make me look like some kind of a weirdo or something.”
Mr. Akin sometimes finds himself handling the delicate balance of distancing himself from the fringe views of some of his supporters without dismissing them.
In Moberly, a woman asked, “With all the unconstitutional things that Obama is doing,” like “being kind to our enemies and unkind to our friends, what’s stopping Congress from impeaching this man?”
“That’s a good question,” Mr. Akin said hesitantly. “Good question. We’ve asked that question.”
He discussed the difficulties in impeaching a president — accusations of high crimes and misdemeanors, and at least 67 votes in the Senate — and then shifted toward a different way to drive Mr. Obama out of the Oval Office.
“Two weeks from now,” he said, referring to Election Day, “that’s the preferred solution to that problem.”

Matthew Orr contributed reporting.

@ The New York Times