‘POACH THE TIGER POACHERS’ POLICY SEEN AS EXTREME BUT NECESSARY

[The Maharashtra forest ministry has sanctioned 70 additional armed guards for the Tadoba tiger research program and 90 armed guards for the Pench Tiger Reserve, both in Maharashtra, the Press Trust of India reported. In addition, forestry offices have been provided with 100 jeeps while a reported “secret fund” of 5 million rupees, about $90,000, has been sanctioned to pay informers for tipping forestry officials about smugglers or poachers.]

By Neha Thirani

J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press 

An Indian tiger looks out from a camouflaged cover
of strawgrass in the Ranthambore National Park,
Rajasthan in this March 23, 2000 file photo.

The Maharashtra state government’s recently launched war on tiger poachers, which involves allowing forest guards to shoot poachers on sight raised few eyebrows in India, as officials stressed the necessity of the extreme measure.

Forestry officials say they plan to arm guards and protect them from prosecution, regardless of any potential concerns from human rights groups. “Human rights groups come in the way if there is any such action, but there is [a] need to save the tigers,” Patangrao Kadam, the Maharashtra forest minister, told the Indian Express.

The move was prompted by the death of five tigers in the last five months due to poaching.

The National Tiger Conservation Authority has also directed all states to treat each tiger or leopard death as a poaching case unless proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt. “As tiger areas are targeted by poachers and tigers are becoming victims of non-targeted killings due to sensitive tiger-human conflicts, there is need to ensure adequate caution while classifying tiger deaths as occurring due to “natural” causes,” said Rajesh Gopal, member secretary of the group.

The Maharashtra forest ministry has sanctioned 70 additional armed guards for the Tadoba tiger research program and 90 armed guards for the Pench Tiger Reserve, both in Maharashtra, the Press Trust of India reported. In addition, forestry offices have been provided with 100 jeeps while a reported “secret fund” of 5 million rupees, about $90,000, has been sanctioned to pay informers for tipping forestry officials about smugglers or poachers.

The forest minister also said an inquiry will be ordered into two tiger deaths in the district of Chandrapur where the tigers were caught in a steel trap. An “inquiry has been instituted to find out whether they died because of poaching or were electrocuted,” he said.

Forestry guards actually have been empowered to shoot poachers on sight since 2002, a separate Times of India article notes, but they have been reluctant to use weapons, as they are concerned about being arrested. A lack of training has been part of the problem, the article notes: only 1,000 field staffers of a total of 11,000 employees of the department have been trained in using weapons.

The Wildlife Protection Society of India says 14 tigers have been killed in India since January, of which eight were poached in Maharashtra alone, the BBC reported.

While a century ago there were an estimated 100,000 tigers in India, a 2011 census counted 1,706 tigers in the wild. However, the BBC did note that the forest minister’s solution would raise legal concerns and opposition from rights groups, and said other officials have tried to play down the forest minister’s remarks saying shooting poachers would be a “last resort” solution.

Tiger poachers have yet to be shot in Maharashtra, the state’s chief wildlife warden, S.W.H. Naqvi, told The Associated Press, but the shooting of illegal fisherman has led to charges against forestry guards.

“These poachers have lost all fear. They just go in and poach what they want because they know the risks are low,” Divyabhanusinh Chavda, head of the World Wildlife Fund in India, told The Associated Press. “A similar measure allowing guards to fire on poachers in Assam has helped the northeast state’s population of endangered one-horned rhinos recover,” The AP reported.

Forestry officials “have had to do something because they have lost a series of tigers in this area and the poachers are acting with impunity,” Belinda Wright, head of the Wildlife Protection Society of India told The Independent.

Perhaps the only place to highlight the potential human rights problems this new push could pose is the media analysis Web site Gawker, which wrote that Indian officials must have been inspired by the 1924 short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell. (In the story, a jaguar hunter who falls off a boat washes ashore on an island owned by a deranged man who hunts humans for sport.)

“If you hate killing animals but love killing people, Maharashtra just might be your scene,” Gawker said.

 [The five-day showcase of 40 features, short films and documentaries is presented by the Indo-American Arts Council, a Manhattan-based non-profit which supports all forms of Indian-influenced art. Many of the screenings are following by question-and-answer sessions with filmmakers and casts.]


@ The New York Times

AT NEW YORK’S INDIAN FILM FESTIVAL, A FOCUS ON YOUTH

[The five-day showcase of 40 features, short films and documentaries is presented by the Indo-American Arts Council, a Manhattan-based non-profit which supports all forms of Indian-influenced art. Many of the screenings are following by question-and-answer sessions with filmmakers and casts.]

By Shivani Vora

Michael ToolanThe 12th annual New York Indian Film Festival
opened on May 23 at the Paris Theater in Midtown Manhattan,
New York City.

The 12th annual New York Indian Film Festival opened Wednesday at the Paris Theater in Midtown Manhattan with a red carpet premier of Bedabrata Pain’s movie “Chittagong,” followed by a dinner at the Jumeirah Essex House on Central Park South.

The five-day showcase of 40 features, short films and documentaries is presented by the Indo-American Arts Council, a Manhattan-based non-profit which supports all forms of Indian-influenced art. Many of the screenings are following by question-and-answer sessions with filmmakers and casts.

High-profile celebrities who turned out for the debut include Indian-American actors Manu Narayan, Ajay Naidu and Samrat Chakrabarti, British actress Sarita Choudhury, Bollywood filmmaker Shyam Benegal and Bollywood actor Suneil Anand, who is the son of legendary filmmaker and actor Dev Anand.

Though the IACC doesn’t try to connect the films screened each year by a specific theme, festival director Aseem Chhabra said that several of the prominent ones this year have young child actors as leads. “The commonality evolved organically,” he said.

The movie that evening, for example, is a true story set in 1930s British India about the journey of 14-year-old Jhunku to find his place in the tumultuous environment around him. Other films with pint-size stars include “Bubble Gum,” a two-hour story about a teenage boy who resents the attention his parents give his deaf older brother, and “Gattu,” which won several prizes at the Berlin International Film Festival earlier this year and is about a street urchin who becomes fixated on kite flying.

Other highlights include a retrospective trilogy of Benegal’s classics “Zubeida,” “Mammo” and “Sardari” and a screening of Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy’s Oscar winning Pakistani Short Film “Saving Face.”

But much of the excitement seemed to be around the Saturday evening tribute to Dev Anand, who passed away in December. The commemoration will be presented alongside a new colorized version of his 1961 hit film, “Hum Dono Rangeen,” which is being shown outside of India for the first time.

Mr. Anand’s son Suneil is attending the festival and told India Ink he wanted to be on hand to support his father. “I feel elated that we are celebrating my dad and his work, but it’s also an emotional experience especially since he is no longer here.”

Opening night also was a poignant time for the Los Angeles-based filmmaker Mr. Pain, who lost his 16-year-old son to an accident while directing “Chittagong.” “He was the movie’s biggest supporter,” he said. But he added that he chose to focus his story around a teenage boy not because he is a father himself but because he believes that India’s future lies with its youth. “The young generation today has such a passion and confidence,” he said. “They are the ones who will shape the India that is to come.”


@ The New York Times