[The announcement also came ahead of a planned visit to India by Herman Van Rompuy,
the European Union president, who was quoted in an interview with The Times of India as saying that he intended to seek the
Indian government’s help in pressing Iran to give up its nuclear program.]
By Rick Gladstone
The trade delegation announcement coincided with new
reports that India, an important consumer of Iranian oil, had eclipsed China for the first time as Iran’s No. 1
petroleum customer last month, subverting efforts by the United States to
persuade other countries to find non-Iranian sources for their energy needs or
risk onerous penalties under a new American sanctions law.
The announcement also came ahead of a planned visit to
India by Herman Van Rompuy, the European Union president, who was quoted in an interview with The Times of India as saying that he intended to seek the
Indian government’s help in pressing Iran to give up its nuclear program.
It was unclear whether Mr. Rompuy knew at the time of the
interview that India ’s commerce secretary, Rahul Khullar, was about to announce
a big economic push into Iran that could serve to counteract the effects of the very
sanctions Mr. Rompuy has helped to promote.
“We will be mounting a mission to Iran at the end of the month to promote our own exports,” Mr.
Khullar told reporters in New
Delhi , according to
Indian and Western accounts of his news conference. “A huge delegation will be
going.”
In what amounted to a rejection of an underlying motive in
the American-European sanction effort, Mr. Khullar said India already was honoring the four rounds of United Nations
sanctions aimed at dissuading Iran from its uranium enrichment program. Those sanctions, he
told reporters, do not apply to “a vast range of products which India can export to Iran .”
Even if the United States and European Union wished to shun business with Iran , Mr. Khullar said, “Tell me why I should follow suit?”
“Why shouldn’t I take up that business opportunity?” he
asked.
The American and European sanctions are primarily aimed at Iran ’s central bank and oil industry. But they have begun to cause
shortages, inflation and payment problems in Iran for a variety of other commodities by preventing Iran from making shipping, insurance and finance arrangements
for imports.
The sanctions already had caused India and Iran difficulties on how to bypass new banking obstacles that
had prevented India from paying Iran ’s oil bills.
In addition to the trade delegation news, the Indian
newspaper The Economic Times reported Thursday
that the Indian government had proposed a barter with Iran in which India would pay for some Iranian oil with Indian wheat. And
Reuters reported that Iran was willing to accept rupees instead of dollars, the
standard currency in oil transactions, for nearly half of the roughly $11
billion worth of oil that India buys from Iran annually.
Iranian news agencies prominently reported Thursday that Iran ’s crude exports to India had increased to 550,000 barrels a day in January, partly
offsetting a reduction by China , which has long been Iran ’s top buyer, to 250,000 barrels a day. Those figures,
first reported by The Wall Street Journal, showed that India was “ignoring recent sanctions imposed by the U.S. and E.U. on importing Iran oil,” the semiofficial Fars News Agency said.
“Iran will barter oil for food, oil for cars,” said Djavad
Salehi-Isfahani, an economist at Virginia
Tech University . “They will find ways.”
The Indian government, Mr. Menendez said, “seems to be
rebuking the sanctions and looking for workarounds.” Asked by Mr. Menendez what
she would do about it, Mrs. Powell, a veteran diplomat, responded that she
understood that “this is going to be a very important topic and one of those
that I will be dealing with very seriously and very early in my tenure.”
PAKISTAN SUPREME COURT REJECTS PRIME MINISTER’SAPPEAL
[At a
separate hearing, Justice Chaudhry ordered the country’s powerful intelligence
agencies to produce seven terror suspects before the court on Friday afternoon.
The order was unusually strong — though the court stopped short of ordering the
head of the intelligence services to appear before the court in person.]
By Salman Masood
The court will start contempt proceedings against Mr.
Gilani on Monday for failing to pursue an investigation against President Asif
Ali Zardari on
corruption charges. Mr. Gilani faces six months of prison and disqualification
from office, if convicted.
Since 2009, the Supreme Court has insisted that the
government write a letter to the authorities in Switzerland, asking them to
reopen a corruption investigation against Mr. Zardari that stretches to the
1990s and involves the president’s finances in that country.
During the court proceedings Friday morning, Chief Justice
Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said the judiciary respected the Parliament and did
not want to create unrest in the country. “We are exercising restraint,”
Justice Chaudhry said, adding that the government had continued to defy court
orders.
“We undermine ourselves if we don’t ensure compliance,”
said Jawad S. Khawaja, another judge, as Aitzaz Ahsan, the lawyer for Mr.
Gilani, tried unsuccessfully to persuade the panel of judges to dismiss the contempt
charges.
Mr. Ahsan maintained that by not writing a letter to the
Swiss authorities, Mr. Gilani was acting on the advice of his legal team and
did not intentionally commit contempt of court.
“He holds the court in highest esteem and respect,” said
Mr. Ahsan, referring to the prime minister.
In the decision, Justice Chaudhry said the court upheld an
earlier summon for Mr. Gilani to appear next week, when he would be indicted.
“The appeal is dismissed,” Justice Chaudhry said.
After the hearing, Mr. Ahsan told reporters that Mr. Gilani
will appear before the court on Monday.
At a separate hearing, Justice Chaudhry ordered the
country’s powerful intelligence agencies to produce seven terror suspects
before the court on Friday afternoon. The order was unusually strong — though
the court stopped short of ordering the head of the intelligence services to
appear before the court in person.
The Supreme Court had earlier this month ordered the
Inter-Services Intelligence directorate, the spy agency, to produce seven
suspected militants it has been holding since 2010 and to explain how four
other detainees from the same group died in mysterious circumstances over the
past six months.
Raja Irshad Kayani, the lawyer representing the ISI, asked
for more time to comply with court orders but was the request was rejected by
Justice Chaudhry.
“We are not willing to entertain a single submission,” the
chief justice said.
“Even the prime minister of the country has appeared before
the court,” Justice Chaudhry said. “When will you be answerable?”
“It might not be possible to bring them before the court on
such short notice,” Mr. Kayani said, referring to the terror suspects.
“Use a helicopter,” Justice Chaudhry responded and said
those suspects who are sick can be brought to the court on stretchers.