* In every South Asian country, except Bhutan and the Maldives , medium-size urban companies consider it one of the top two constraints, according to a World Bank report on jobs in South Asia , which will be released regionally in January.
* Not all of India ’s neighbors have experienced the same job growth. In Pakistan , there was a broadly declining trend in per capita growth during the past 40 years. Sri Lanka showed accelerated growth over the past 50 years but had a dip in the 1980s. Nepal had stagnated per capital growth during the past 20 years.
By Sruthi Gottipati
Prashanth Vishwanathan/Bloomberg NewsLaborers
working at a construction site in Noida,
Uttar Pradesh.
|
What is the biggest problem companies in India and neighboring countries face today?
It’s not access to land, skills shortages, the vagaries of government
policy or its red tape-laden bureaucracy.
It is electricity.
In every South Asian country, except Bhutan and the Maldives , medium-size urban companies consider
it one of the top two constraints, according to a World Bank report on jobs in South Asia , which will be released regionally in
January.
That was one of several surprising findings of the report, which is
focused on the quantity and quality of jobs in South Asia in the last decade and is based on more
than a year’s research.
Isabel Guerrero, World Bank vice president for South Asia , who worked on the report, sat down
with India Ink recently to explain its findings.
“There has been a lot of growth of jobs in South Asia and the quality of these jobs has been
improving,” Ms. Guerrero said.
“Jobs in every sector, every group of workers, all of them have seen an
increase in wages.”
The good news, the report says, is that total employment in South Asia , excluding Afghanistan and Bhutan , has grown by an average of almost
800,000 new jobs per month. The less good news is that an estimated 1 million to
1.2 million new workers will join the labor market every month over the next
few decades. And there needs to be enough jobs for them.
In almost all of the countries, the largest portion of workers is
self-employed. But don’t think of a mass of small shopkeepers and businessmen:
nearly a third of workers in India and a fifth of workers in Bangladesh and Pakistan are casual laborers, many of them just
scraping by. Regular wage and salaried workers represent a fifth or less of
total employment.
But an interesting finding of the report, as Ms. Guerrero pointed out,
is that the quality of these jobs — measured by growth in real wages or falling
poverty — has improved for all segments in the labor force. In India , over the decade between 1999 and 2010,
there was a decline in the average number of months for which all casual
laborers were without work despite looking for it.
Typically, salaried workers have the highest wages and lowest poverty
rates, the self-employed are poorer, and casual labor, especially those in
agriculture, have the lowest wages and highest poverty rates. The proportion of
workers in different employment types has remained largely unchanged over time.
In other words, even if workers are not moving to better jobs the ones
they have offer better wages.
In India , the report points to some positive
signs in job creation: There’s been accelerated gross national product per
capita, especially since the 1980s, which is a sign of economic growth.
Not all of India ’s neighbors have experienced the same job
growth. In Pakistan , there was a broadly declining trend in
per capita growth during the past 40 years. Sri Lanka showed accelerated growth over the past
50 years but had a dip in the 1980s. Nepal had stagnated per capital growth during
the past 20 years.
In the case of Pakistan and Nepal , Ms. Guerrero said, people sought jobs
abroad and sent remittances back home. In India , although migration is also high, there
was also significant domestic job creation.
The report found that labor force participation of women in South Asia is one of the lowest in the world.
And the lowest rates are in the largest countries: only a fifth of
Pakistani women work outside the home, and a third in Bangladesh and India .
It is not that women are not working. According to the report, household
duties were cited as the most important reason for women not joining the labor
force.
Ms. Guerrero also notes an important trend: When more women work,
violence in the family also increased – but only initially. Eventually men see
that women are bringing valuable income into the home and the violence reduces.
“It doesn’t happen overnight but it is happening in South Asia ,” Ms. Guerrero said.
Solving India ’s key problem – the electrical power
shortage – may require the country to form a strategy with its neighbors, with
countries transferring power when they have an excess of it.
Ms. Guerrero said countries can take advantage of a dip in the
electricity load due to time or climate differences. Central Asia , for instance, has surplus power in the
summer, which it can export.
Ms. Guerrero also gives the example of Nepal . Although the country is currently
importing electricity from India , with a stable political climate, it
may be able to provide electricity in the future because of its rich Himalayan
hydropower resources.
“Looking at the power question in a regional way is the way to go for
the future,” she said. “It’s a win-win for both sides.”
IN LIBYA , MASSACRESITE IS CLEANED UP, NOT INVESTIGATED
[The lack of control came into sharp focus last week, when former rebel fighters arrested Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. In videos of the capture on Thursday morning, victorious fighters were shown manhandling Colonel Qaddafi, who appeared to be bleeding and distressed but conscious. This was moments after he was pulled from a large drainage pipe where he had hidden after a NATO air assault destroyed part of his convoy. Subsequent video shows his bruised corpse, with at least one bullet wound to the head.]
By Kareem Fahim And Adam Nossiter
Mauricio Lima for The New York Times
Volunteers in Surt removed bodies of people apparently killed
in reprisal by Many had their hands bound and had been shot
in the head. anti-Qaddafi militias.
|
The volunteers said the victims included at least two former Qaddafi
government officials, local loyalist fighters and maybe civilians. The killers,
they believed, were former rebel fighters, belonging to anti-Qaddafi units that
had used the hotel as a base in recent weeks. It appeared to be one of the
worst massacres of the eight-month conflict, but days after it occurred, no one
from Libya ’s new government had come to investigate.
The interim leaders, who declared the country liberated on Sunday, may
simply have their hands full with the responsibilities that come with running a
state. But throughout the Libyan conflict, they have also shown themselves to
be unwilling or incapable of looking into accusations of atrocities by their
fighters, despite repeated pledges not to tolerate abuse.
The lack of control came into sharp focus last week, when former rebel
fighters arrested Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. In
videos of the capture on Thursday morning, victorious fighters were shown
manhandling Colonel Qaddafi, who appeared to be bleeding and distressed but
conscious. This was moments after he was pulled from a large drainage pipe
where he had hidden after a NATO air assault destroyed part of his convoy.
Subsequent video shows his bruised corpse, with at least one bullet wound to
the head.
On Monday, Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the chairman of the Transitional
National Council, as the interim governing body is known, announced the
formation of a commission of inquiry into the death of Colonel Qaddafi.
In his announcement, Mr. Abdel-Jalil acknowledged that pressure from
foreign powers and rights groups — including some that supported the rebellion
— had prompted the decision to investigate how Colonel Qaddafi wound up dead
with a bullet to the head. Mr. Abdel-Jalil referred to “demands of the
international community” for an investigation.
But it was unclear from his comments how much authority the committee
would have to pursue an investigation and whether anyone might be held
accountable. He also suggested that anti-Qaddafi fighters may not have been the
ones who killed him, hinting that the fatal bullets might even have come from
Colonel Qaddafi’s own supporters. That suggestion is sharply at odds with the
video evidence that has surfaced of Colonel Qaddafi’s death.
As in several previous instances during the uprising when anti-Qaddafi
fighters were suspected of abuses or of extralegal killings, the leaders of the
rebellion face a delicate balance as they try to bolster their own legitimacy
by courting or coddling powerful militia leaders. The interim leaders have also
failed to establish a chain of command among the armed militias, despite
repeated attempts to form a national army.
Some of the anti-Qaddafi fighters have been accused of arbitrary arrests
and torture, and others have been implicated in killings. In August, Gen. Abdul
Fattah Younes, the rebel’s top military commander, was killed in Benghazi along with two of his aides, Mr.
Abdel-Jalil also said then that there would an investigation, asserting that no
one, not even the highest officials, would be immune.
At the time, Mr. Abdel-Jalil suggested that Colonel Qaddafi’s loyalists
might have been responsible, even as his colleagues conceded that rebel
fighters were the chief suspects in the killings. No one has been prosecuted
for the killing.
On Monday, in offering his new theory for how Colonel Qaddafi may have
died at the hands of his own disciples, Mr. Abdel-Jalil suggested that they may
have feared he would implicate them in atrocities if he had survived and been
put on trial.
“Let us question who has the interest in the fact that Qaddafi will not
be tried,” he said. “Libyans want to try him for what he did to them, with executions,
imprisonment and corruption. Free Libyans wanted to keep Qaddafi in prison and
humiliate him as long as possible. Those who wanted him killed were those who
were loyal to him or had played a role under him. His death was in their
benefit.”
This theory appeared to be an attempt to deflect sharp international
questions about the government’s handling of Colonel Qaddafi’s final moments.
The body, which has been on public display since Thursday in the western city
of Misurata , was scheduled to be buried on Tuesday in
a secret location in the desert, according to a Transitional National Council
official, Reuters reported. Saying that the “corpse cannot last longer,” the
official said Muslim clerics would attend the ceremony.
The colonel’s death has ended the fighting for now, but abuses by former
rebel fighters continue: they were seen looting generators, cars and an
exercise bike in Surt on Monday.
The Mahari Hotel, which overlooks the sea, was filled with suspicious
signs about the killers, but nothing conclusive. The names of anti-Qaddafi
brigades were scrawled on a whiteboard in the lobby, including brigades called
Tiger, Lion, Panther and the Sand. Several of the brigades listed were from
Misurata.
At a graveyard near the hotel, a local doctor looked after the massacre
victims, photographing the bodies and pulling a tooth from each victim,
collecting evidence for the men’s families and for a criminal trial, should one
take place. He ordered an assistant to splash water and spray insect repellent
on the decomposing corpses that were waiting for burial.
Several of the victims wore fatigues. The hands of one man, who looked
to be in his 20s, were bound behind his back. Several victims wore bandages,
leading the volunteers to speculate that they had been patients at the city’s
main hospital who were detained when the former rebels captured it.
Another doctor, watching, shook his head. “What kind of democracy costs
all this blood?” he said.
The doctor, who requested anonymity because he feared retribution by
former rebel fighters, said that if the killings were not investigated, the
inaction would fuel dangerous resentments. “There will be no peace in Libya for years,” he said.