[Bhutan’s young democracy, only a decade old, just received a heady dose of the unhappiness that comes with electoral politics. In the months leading up to Thursday’s national elections, the first in five years, politicians traded insults and made extravagant promises. Social media networks lit up with unproved allegations and fearmongering about Bhutan’s role in the world.]
By Joanna Slater
 |
A Bhutanese man stands near election campaign posters featuring the photos
of candidates at the main entrance of a college in Thimphu on Wednesday.
(Diptendu Dutta/AFP/Getty Images)
|
CHUNJE,
Bhutan — It is harvest time
in this village in western Bhutan, and residents are reaping an unusual crop:
politicians making promises.
One politician vowed to pave the local road,
now a rutted dirt track skirting a river, within three months. Another pledged
to expand a nearby elementary school into a high school. A third warned against
believing what the other two had said.
Within families in the village, divisions
have erupted over which party to support in this week’s election, while partisan
messages pop up daily on cellphones via a social media app called WeChat.
“In terms of peace and quiet and harmony, the
old system was much better,” said Chencho Dorji, 68, picking up a sheaf of rice
and feeding it into a thresher.
A small Himalayan nation wedged between India
and China, Bhutan is famed for its isolated location, stunning scenery and
devotion to the principle of “Gross National Happiness,” which seeks to balance
economic growth with other forms of contentment.
Bhutan’s young democracy, only a decade old,
just received a heady dose of the unhappiness that comes with electoral
politics. In the months leading up to Thursday’s national elections, the first
in five years, politicians traded insults and made extravagant promises. Social
media networks lit up with unproved allegations and fearmongering about
Bhutan’s role in the world.
It is enough to make some voters express a
longing for the previous system — absolute monarchy under a beloved king. “I
would love to go back,” said Karma Tenzin, 58, sitting in his apartment in the
picturesque capital, Thimphu. “We would be more than happy.”
Bhutan is roughly twice the size of New
Jersey and blanketed with mountains. In Bhutanese culture, where unity is
prized, the advent of democracy has been a mixed blessing.
“We feel sad with all of these social
divisions,” said Dorji Penjore, who heads the Center for Bhutan and Gross
National Happiness Studies, a government think tank. Democracy in Bhutan is
“going to work, but naturally there are going to be costs.”
Unusual
Path
If any country could figure out how to be a
happy democracy, Bhutan would be it. Long before there were courses in
happiness studies at U.S. universities and happiness curriculums in elementary
schools, Bhutan led the way in placing national contentment at the heart of its
policymaking.
That philosophy helped Bhutan, a relatively
poor country of 750,000 people, chart a unique course for its economic
development. It accepts tourists but seeks to limit the flow with mandatory
high fees; its constitution requires that at least 60 percent of its landmass
remain forested, which has turned it into one of the only carbon-negative
countries in the world.
Bhutan also had an unusual path toward
democracy: Rather than voters rising up to fight for the right to elect their
leaders, the country’s revered fourth king, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, initiated
himself into the process of drafting a democratic constitution.
The way elections are structured here is
atypical, too. Buddhist monks, nuns and other clergy are not allowed to vote,
on the logic that they should remain outside politics. No campaigning is
allowed after 6 p.m. And candidates found “defaming” their opponents or
straying into certain sensitive topics — such as Bhutan’s oppressively close
relationship with India — face fines or reprimands.
From the external signs, it was hard even to
tell there was an election underway. There were no campaign posters, except on easily
missed public notice boards, no buses plastered with candidates’ pictures, and
nothing resembling a lawn sign. The slogans of the two parties — “Narrowing the
gap” and “Progress with equity and justice” — were not exactly fervid.
But the campaign was intense, even if the
mudslinging did not quite register on the U.S. scale. One party’s supporters
filed a complaint with the Election Commission of Bhutan arguing that their
opponents had defamed them by describing their leader as “all talk and no
substance.” Another complaint alleged one party’s supporters had described the
other party as “anti-national.” In both cases, the commission levied fines.
Like democracies throughout the world, Bhutan
is wrestling with the effect of new technology on elections — a challenge that
is particularly acute in a once-traditional society that allowed television
only in 1999.
“The main challenge we face is social media,”
said Sonam Tobgay, a senior official at the Election Commission. A particular
concern: anonymous posts by “faceless people who create disharmony in the
society.”
Sitting on his desk on a recent afternoon was
a letter from the government to Facebook asking it to suspend seven pages being
used regularly by supporters of the two political parties contesting the
election to “spread false information and hate messages.”
Lotay Tshering, a urologist by training, is
the president of the Druk Nyamrup Tshogpa (DNT), or Bhutan United Party, one of
the two parties that were vying to govern Bhutan in Thursday’s the final round
of elections. At a campaign event this month, he was describing the insults
lobbed at him on social media — including that he was a liar and cheater — when
he started to choke up.
“I was just struck by my emotions; I couldn’t
continue,” he said in an interview Tuesday. “I’m pretty sure these [insults] are
engineered by my opponents.”
Late Thursday, his party emerged victorious
in the polls, according to provisional election results, sweeping 30 out of 47
seats in Bhutan’s National Assembly.
His opponent, Pema Gyamtsho, president of the
Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT), or Bhutan Peace and Prosperity Party,
congratulated Lotay Tshering on his win. Pema Gyamtsho, too, had bemoaned the
use of social media in the election to fling insults under the cover of
anonymity.
“I guess that is part of the game, but we can
do without it in a small society,” Pema Gyamtsho said before the poll.
“Everybody should worry about division and disunity.”
Political
Headaches
Those concerns were echoed on the streets of
Thimphu, a capital city without a single stoplight where these days roofs are
strewn with red chilies drying in the sun before being stored for winter.
“These party workers come to our houses and stoke bad feelings,” said Dorji
Pem, 66, in a neighborhood in the northern part of the city. “It’s so
irritating it makes your head burst.”
Bhutan’s own happiness researchers say
democracy is weighing on the country’s contentedness. Dorji Penjore, of the
Center for Bhutan, noted the last quinquennial survey of the nation, in 2015,
showed a decrease in two of nine indicators used to measure Gross National
Happiness — psychological well-being and community vitality.
“Our intuition is democracy played a part,”
he said. “We are assuming that it was due to party politics.”
He added that some aspects of democracy run
up against elements of Bhutanese culture, which is deeply influenced by
Buddhist precepts. The fact that candidates must flaunt their strengths and
belittle their opponents is disconcerting for an older generation of Bhutanese,
he said. But “in democracy, to be humble is to commit electoral suicide.”
Still, both Bhutanese voters and politicians
are making the switch — and some are even enjoying it. On a recent afternoon,
Phub Tshering, a DPT candidate for parliament, began a final round of
door-to-door campaigning in Chunje, a village about 12 miles north of the town
of Paro.
He cheerfully stomped through fields of
freshly shorn rice in the shadow of a jagged peak with flanks that rose in
shades of green, ochre and slate toward a deep-blue sky. His brother, an
unofficial campaign aide, handed out little pouches of areca nut wrapped in
betel leaf, a mild stimulant that reddens the teeth when chewed.
Around the country, the most important issues
were unemployment and health care. But in Chunje, voters were worried about a
shortage of drinking water, finding ways to keep wild boars out of the rice
fields and the poor condition of the village road.
The real problem, according to Phub Tshering,
was that his opponent from the DNT had “told all these lies.” So many lies had
been told, he said, that it was “time for a counterattack from my side.”
As he hopped into his car to set off for his
next campaign stop, he called out a jaunty farewell. “Be happy!”
Read more
Read more
As China-India feud ebbs, tiny Bhutan re-examines its place in the world
Bhutan’s modern ‘Dragon King’ weds longtime girlfriend
India is trying to prevent apocalyptic air pollution. Step 1: Stop farmers from burning their fieldsBhutan’s modern ‘Dragon King’ weds longtime girlfriend