[Analysts in China said Beijing ’s approval of the sanctions
proposed by the United States was the result of a complex
calculus by Communist Party leaders. A factor that has loomed large for them in
recent weeks is plans by Washington to deploy an antiballistic
missile system, called Thaad, in South Korea . Chinese officials are seeking
ways to prevent that from happening.]
a
The
Sanctions have been tightening since 2006. Credit Wong Maye-E/ Associated Press |
SEOUL, South Korea — As a new set of sanctions
against North
Koreacirculated at the United
Nations Security Council, analysts in South Korea and China
expressed doubts on Friday that the measures would be tough enough to force the
pariah state to give up its nuclear
weapons.
The United States presented a draft resolution it had negotiated with China to the
Security Council on Thursday, calling for wide-ranging penalties against North
Korea for a nuclear
test it conducted on Jan. 6 and for its launching of a long-range rocket a
month later, both of which violated previous council resolutions.
The
draft contained the most comprehensive and toughest sanctions against the
isolated country that the council has ever considered. There was no doubt that
they would squeeze North Korea ’s ability to raise funds for its weapons
programs, depending on how vigorously China , the North’s single largest trade partner,
enforced the sanctions, analysts said.
If adopted, the resolution would require
United Nations member states to inspect all cargo passing through their
territories to or from North Korea for illicit goods. It would also attempt to
limit North
Korea ’s
sale of minerals, especially coal and iron ore, two of its most important
exports.
But the draft contained no effective
sanctions against a booming trade across the relatively porous 870-mile border
between China and North Korea — a lifeline not only for the impoverished North
Korean people but also for their government’s ability to earn cash. Nor did it
require countries, especially China , to cut off oil exports to the North.
It would also not affect tens
of thousands of North Korean workers at factories, construction sites and
logging camps in China , Russia , Africa and the Middle East . According to some estimates,
they send home $200 million to $300 million a year, most of which human rights
groups contend ends up in the coffers of the North’s leader, Kim Jong-un.
“These sanctions will certainly hurt the North,” said Koh
Yu-hwan, a professor at Dongguk University in Seoul . “But I don’t think they will
hurt them enough to abandon their nuclear
weapons.”
Analysts in China said Beijing ’s approval of the sanctions
proposed by the United States was the result of a complex
calculus by Communist Party leaders. A factor that has loomed large for them in
recent weeks is plans by Washington to deploy an antiballistic
missile system, called Thaad, in South Korea . Chinese officials are seeking
ways to prevent that from happening.
“If it was not for the Thaad issue, there might not be such
cooperation between China and the U.S. ,” said Shen Dingli, a professor
of international relations at Fudan University in Shanghai . “By doing this, it is still
possible for China to dissuade the Americans from
deploying Thaad at China ’s doorstep.”
Nor would the proposed sanctions affect North Korea ’s growing business of making
clothes on contracts from Chinese companies. North Korean textile exports to China expanded to $741 million in
2014 from $186 million in 2010, and the goods are made mostly at factories run
by the North Korean military or the ruling Workers’ Party, analysts and
officials in Seoul said.
“There are still too many loopholes for us to predict that they
will lead to North Korea ’s denuclearization,” said
Chang Yong-seok, an analyst at the Institute for Peace and Unification Studies
at Seoul National University . “These sanctions are more
like a warning to the North about how much more it could suffer if it conducted
another nuclear test, and an inducement for the country to return to the
negotiating table.”
Currently, an estimated 75 percent of North Korea ’s foreign trade, including
almost all of its oil imports, is with China , providing Beijing with unique economic leverage
over the North. The two-way trade amounted to $5.5 billion last year, according
to figures from Chinese customs authorities.
But China ’s approach on how to solve the
North Korean problem is fundamentally different from that of the United States or South Korea . It insists that sanctions
should not aim to push North Korea toward instability but to
induce it back to the negotiating table.
After negotiating the proposed
sanctions with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, Secretary of State John Kerry
said on Tuesday that North Korea could ultimately have a peace
agreement with the United States “if it will come to the table
and negotiate the denuclearization.”
North
Korea has been hit with a series of ever-tightening sanctions because
of its nuclear tests and rocket launches since 2006. But the effect on one of
the world’s least trade-dependent economies has been limited, especially when China has opposed crippling
penalties.
The government has learned to shift the pain of international
sanctions to its people by squeezing the resources available for the poor,
while the elite has remained intact, defectors from the country have said.
Still, the proposed sanctions, especially mandatory inspections
of all cargo, would make it harder for North Korea to raise funds and import
technology for its nuclear and ballistic missile programs, analysts said. Until
now, countries were required to inspect North Korean cargo only if they had
reasonable grounds to believe it contained illicit items.
The proposed resolution would also ban countries from selling to
the North all small arms and other conventional weapons, as well as dual-use
nuclear and missile-related goods and items like trucks that could be converted
for military use. It would also ban the sales of aviation and rocket fuel to
hurt the North Korean military’s ability to conduct regular drills. The
resolution is also expected to expand the list of luxury goods countries are
banned from selling to the North.
“This could be bad because most of the parts for the nuclear
facilities could only come from the outside world,” Wang Junsheng, a researcher
on North Korea at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said about the
mandatory inspection of cargo.
Mr. Wang said negotiations between the United States and China over the terms of the
sanctions had dragged on for seven weeks because Washington had wanted Beijing to cut off more trade. That
included exports of oil and imports of coal, he said.
But although China was fed up with Mr. Kim’s aggressive and
unpredictable behavior, it refused to enshrine those trade limits in the
sanctions because energy supplies are tied to the well-being of civilians in
North Korea and China — especially important during the harsh winter, he said.
“Cutting off the trade could
trigger a mass-scale humanitarian crisis,” Mr. Wang said.
Choe
Sang-Hun reported from Seoul , and Edward Wong from Beijing . Yufan Huang contributed
research.