[In the opening remarks at the
meeting, Sartaj Aziz, the senior foreign policy aide to Pakistan ’s prime minister, Nawaz
Sharif, said that Pakistan was committed to furthering
the Afghan reconciliation process. But he resisted calls by some officials for
the Pakistan military to threaten to crack
down on Taliban factions that refused to join the talks, saying that any
preconditions would be counterproductive.]
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Senior
diplomats from Pakistan, Afghanistan,China and the United States met in Islamabad
on Monday to try to lay the groundwork for a new round of peace talks with the Taliban.
The push for new talks has
taken on urgency in recent months, as aggressive Taliban offensives have been
seizing large sections of Afghan territory. The presence of both American and
Chinese officials at the meeting was seen as a signal of the importance of the
negotiations.
While some officials held out hope that Taliban representatives
and Afghan officials could meet as early as next month, the meeting on Monday
seemed as much about trying to smooth over months of tension between Pakistan
and Afghanistan as about any real prospect of a change of heart by the Taliban.
After the meeting, the officials released a statement saying that another
planning session would take place in Kabul , the Afghan capital, next
Monday.
The first and only official
Afghan talks with the Taliban were in July, after intensive efforts by the
Afghan president, Ashraf Ghani, to win Pakistan ’s help in bringing the
insurgents to the table. That effort fell apart after news that the Taliban’s
supreme leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, had died more than two years before. Mr.
Ghani was left with nothing to show, after losing considerable political
support back home for courting the Pakistani military, which some Afghan
officials accuse of sheltering the Taliban for use as a proxy force.
Since then, relations between the neighboring countries have
soured. Afghan officials have accused Pakistan of not living up to its
promises to try to rein in the Taliban through a year of territorial gains. And
Pakistani officials have been rankled by the Ghani government’s closer ties
with India , Pakistan ’s archenemy, which has
expanded its aid to Afghanistan to include weaponry.
On Monday, the officials gathered to discuss the importance of
resuming direct talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government. But no
representatives for the insurgents were present, and since the July talks, many
senior Taliban commanders have adamantly opposed even the prospect of new talks
while the insurgency is doing so well on the battlefield.
In the opening remarks at the meeting, Sartaj Aziz, the senior
foreign policy aide to Pakistan ’s prime minister, Nawaz
Sharif, said that Pakistan was committed to furthering
the Afghan reconciliation process. But he resisted calls by some officials for
the Pakistan military to threaten to crack
down on Taliban factions that refused to join the talks, saying that any
preconditions would be counterproductive.
“The threat of use of military
action against irreconcilables cannot precede the offer of talks to all the
groups,” Mr. Aziz said.
Mr. Aziz was joined by Pakistan ’s foreign secretary, Aizaz
Ahmad Chaudhry, in representing Pakistan at the meeting, and Deputy
Foreign Minister Hekmat Karzai came from Afghanistan . The new United States special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan , Richard G. Olson, took part,
as did the Pentagon’s top envoy to Pakistan , Lt. Gen. Anthony J. Rock. China was represented by Deng Xijun,
the special envoy for Afghan affairs.
One senior Pakistani intelligence official, speaking on
condition of anonymity to discuss the political considerations surrounding the
peace process, acknowledged the hard feelings between Pakistan and Afghanistan before the meeting, saying,
“As long as Kabul and India try to undermine Pakistan , the talks will not succeed.”
The senior Pakistani official held out hope that some Taliban
figures could be persuaded to join the talks next month, but admitted that even
then it would be very unlikely to have any sweeping effect.
“At best, we can convince three to four Taliban groups,” the
official said. “But it is yet to be decided which group will act as the head
during the talks and whether it can influence all of the warring Taliban.”
“There are too many
stakeholders involved,” the official added. “And what can Kabul really offer to the Taliban?”